Skip to content

T2 1847-1140SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Reconstruction Nail R2.0, Ti, RIGHT · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613153317005), received between Jul 23, 2018 and Aug 13, 2018 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Defective Device1

Patient problems

  • Impaired Healing1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 13, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF ADVERSE EVENTS FROM THE NORWEGIAN HIP FRACTURE REGISTER. THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿T2 RECON IN THE NORWEGIAN HIP FRACTURE REGISTER¿ WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE T2 RECON NAILING SYSTEM, WITHIN THAT REPORT, POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS/ ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED, WHICH OCCURRED BETWEEN 2009 AND 2017. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE REVEALED THAT THE EVENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED PREVIOUSLY TO STRYKER, THEREFORE 13 EVENTS WERE INITIATED RETROSPECTIVELY FOR DIFFERENT ADVERSE EVENTS MENTIONED IN THE REPORT. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES REVISION SURGERY DUE TO OSTEOSYNTHESIS FAILURE. THE PATIENT RECEIVED A RE-OSTEOSYNTHESIS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7779113 ↗
  • InjuryJul 23, 2018Defective Device

    THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF A POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP (PMCF) FROM (B)(6). THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿ANALYSIS OF THE T2 RECON NAIL USED WITH THE ANTEGRADE LOCKING MODE¿ WHICH WAS RELEASED IN JUNE 2018 AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE T2 RECON NAILING SYSTEM. WITHIN THAT REPORT, POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS/ ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED, WHICH OCCURRED BETWEEN JANUARY 2014 AND NOVEMBER 2017. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE DEVICE AND PATIENT INFORMATION AND A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE IT WAS REVEALED THAT THE EVENTS HAVE NOT BEEN REPORTED BY THE HOSPITAL OR BY THE AUTHOR OF THE REPORT, THEREFORE 15 COMPLAINTS WERE INITIATED RETROSPECTIVELY FOR DIFFERENT ADVERSE EVENTS MENTIONED IN THE JOURNAL. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES DELAYED OR NONUNION. SIX (CASE ID 15) OUT OF 7 CASES. AS PER THE PMCFR, THE TREATMENT WAS DONE BY A NEW NAILING AFTER REAMING. T2 RECON NAIL LOCKED PROXIMALLY IN THE RECON MODE.

    Patient problems: Impaired Healing

    MAUDE report 7710366 ↗

Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices

All ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page