Skip to content

Restoration 6276-1-321Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Modular Hip System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Restoration (86)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613154057917), received between Jul 6, 2020 and Apr 28, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Fracture1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Metal Related Pathology1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 28, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: AS REPORTED BY HCP: I JUST RECEIVED WORD THAT OUR COMPASSIONATE USE PATIENT WAS SENT TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FROM THE ORTHO CLINIC. PATIENT HAD HER 8 WEEK FOLLOW UP IN CLINIC TODAY WITH COMPLAINTS OF NEW ONSET RIGHT HIP PAIN AND CLICKING FOR THE LAST 2 WEEKS. ON X-RAY, THE HIP WAS FOUND TO BE DISLOCATED. SHE HAS BEEN ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL AND WILL HAVE A REVISION TOMORROW. WE'LL KNOW MORE TOMORROW. PER PSS TEAM: A PATIENT SPECIFIC FLANGED ACETABULAR CUP (P/N: C-MM100731-00) WAS IMPLANTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM SALES REP: THE ENTIRE ((B)(6) 2026) REVISION WAS STRYKER PROJECTS WITH REST MOD IN THE FEMUR AND MDM CONSTRUCT IN THE CUP (NOTE: THE (B)(6) 2026 SURGERY TO IMPLANT STRYKER IMPLANTS WAS A REVISION OF NON-STRYKER IMPLANTS). THE REASON FOR THE DISLOCATION WAS A BRACE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT DURING PT (BRACE WAS REMOVED BY PHYSICAL THERAPIST AGAINST SURGEON ADVICE AFTER HAVING BEEN ASKED 3 TIMES TO REMOVE THE BRACE) AND HER ENTIRE GREATER TROCHANTER BROKE OFF DUE OVER MOVEMENT OF THE OPERATIVE LEG. IT WAS DISCOVERED YESTERDAY, IN SURGERY, THAT HER ABDUCTORS WERE NO LONGER ATTACHED TO KEEP THE HIP IN PLACE. THE MDM CONSTRUC

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 25017086 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ITS REPORTED BY THE ATTORNEY, THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT, THAT THE PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT A LEFT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2017. ITS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT ELEVATED LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT WERE REVEALED IN BLOOD WORK. PLAINTIFF HAS NOT YET BEEN REVISED.

    Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 19389026 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2021Fracture; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Fracture; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HIS RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2009 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2016. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT HE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION AND EXPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE, DEVICE RECALL AND EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT IN HIS BLOOD. UPDATE: THE REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT STATES ¿HE REPORTS THAT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AGO HE HAD SEVERE ONSET OF SEVERE PAIN IN THE RIGHT THIGH AREA. HE CAME TO MY OFFICE FOR EVALUATION. X-RAYS WERE OBTAINED OF THE RIGHT HIP AND THESE DEMONSTRATED WHAT APPEARED TO BE MALALIGNMENT OF THE MODULAR FEMORAL COMPONENT IN THE FEMUR. THE ANGLE APPEARED DIFFERENT FROM PREVIOUS X-RAYS SUGGESTING FRACTURE OF THE DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE MODULAR STEM.¿ THE FEMORAL STEM WAS BROKEN AT THE TRUNNION OF THE DISTAL SEGMENT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Pain

    MAUDE report 11569293 ↗
  • InjuryJul 6, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PLAINTIFF WAS IMPLANTED WITH A HOWMEDICA RESTORATION MODULAR HIP SYSTEM, REFERENCE NO. 6276-1-321 UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF CONTAINING A REJUVENATE OR ABG II MODULAR HIP STEM ON HIS RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2010. PLAINTIFF HAS NOT HAD THE RIGHT HIP STEM EXPLANTED AT THE PRESENT TIME; HOWEVER, HE HAS EXPERIENCE SEVERE PAIN AND COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE RIGHT HIP STEM AND WAS SEEN FOR SAID PAIN ON (B)(6) 2014 AT (B)(6) MEDICAL CENTER EMERGENCY ROOM. PLAINTIFF HASN'T BEEN REVISED. THIS PI IS FOR THE SEVERE PAIN AND COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE RESTORATION MODULAR HIP SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 10233111 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page