Skip to content

TARGET M0035471230Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Soft Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET (114)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252192671), received between Mar 29, 2019 and Jan 8, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Fracture1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) ANEURYSM PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR POSITIONED THE LONG SHEATH AND INTERMEDIATE CATHETER AND SUPER-SELECTIVELY ADVANCED ONE MICROCATHETER TO THE DISTAL M2 SEGMENT TO SERVE AS THE STENT MICROCATHETER, WHILE ANOTHER MICROCATHETER WAS DELIVERED TO THE ANEURYSM SITE. A SUBJECT COIL WAS THEN INTRODUCED. DURING THE DELIVERY PROCESS, THE OPERATOR FELT RESISTANCE AND WITHDREW THE SUBJECT COIL, DISCOVERING THAT ITS TIP HAD FRACTURED. THE OPERATOR THEN WITHDREW THE ENTIRE COIL MICROCATHETER, WITH THE FRACTURED PORTION OF THE SUBJECT COIL REMAINING INSIDE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24015940 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 22, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT COIL DEPLOYED PREMATURELY DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13579166 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 29, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANEURYSM CASE, WHEN ADVANCING THE SUBJECT COIL INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER, THE RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED, THEREFORE; THE SUBJECT COIL WAS WITHDRAWN, AND IT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL AND MICROCATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER AS A UNIT. THE OPERATOR REPLACED THEM WITH A NEW MICROCATHETER AND NEW COIL TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8467126 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page