TARGET M0035443560Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 360 Nano Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252600343), received between Nov 21, 2019 and May 21, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation4
- Fracture3
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT SUBJECT COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE IN PATIENT'S VESSEL. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT AS PER PHYSICIAN SUBJECT COIL KEPT GOING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM, AND THIS WAS BECAUSE OF THE ANEURYSM'S MORPHOLOGY. THE OPERATOR KEPT TRYING TO PUSH AND PULL THE COIL IN & OUT OF THE STENT, AND SUDDENLY IT WAS DETACHED WITHOUT ANY DETACHMENT DEVICE CONNECTED. AS, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS STUCK AT THE TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER, THEY COULD EASILY REMOVE THE COIL FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22066300 ↗MalfunctionJan 17, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation
THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL HAD PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16184001 ↗MalfunctionSep 22, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS BROKEN DURING USE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12514453 ↗MalfunctionJan 7, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL BROKE OFF WHILE THE PHYSICIAN WAS RETRACTING IT INTO THE MICRO CATHETER. THE BROKEN COIL WAS RETRIEVED USING A GUIDE WIRE THROUGH THE MICRO CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11135616 ↗InjuryDec 28, 2020Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT FIRST COIL WAS DETACHED IN THE ANEURYSM; HOWEVER, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED A SECOND COIL, IT WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THE COIL OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER SINCE TO THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FIRST MAIN COIL WAS STUCK INSIDE THE CATHETER TIP. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL BACK THE CATHETER, THE CATHETER DRAGGED THE FIRST COIL BACK IN THE VESSEL. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE SUPRACLINOID INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) TO HELD DOWN THE COIL TAIL IN THE VESSEL. 90 MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS NOT AFFECTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11074676 ↗MalfunctionNov 24, 2020Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
THE TARGET COIL DIDN'T DEPLOY OUT OF THE CASING; IT DID NOT PUSH OUT OF THE SHEATH. IT DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION, TARGET (PER SITE REPORTER). THEY SENT A (B)(6) LABEL TO RETURN THE DEVICE TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10894160 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL (TARGET) PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE CATHETER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENTS¿ MEDICAL CONDITION WAS GOOD. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10347197 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2019Fracture; Premature Separation; Fracture; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER AND POSSIBLY FRACTURED FROM THE ANEURYSM. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9360162 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page