Skip to content

TARGET M0035443560Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Nano Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252600343), received between Nov 21, 2019 and May 21, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation4
  • Fracture3
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT SUBJECT COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE IN PATIENT'S VESSEL. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT AS PER PHYSICIAN SUBJECT COIL KEPT GOING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM, AND THIS WAS BECAUSE OF THE ANEURYSM'S MORPHOLOGY. THE OPERATOR KEPT TRYING TO PUSH AND PULL THE COIL IN & OUT OF THE STENT, AND SUDDENLY IT WAS DETACHED WITHOUT ANY DETACHMENT DEVICE CONNECTED. AS, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS STUCK AT THE TIP OF THE MICROCATHETER, THEY COULD EASILY REMOVE THE COIL FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22066300 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 17, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL HAD PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16184001 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 22, 2021Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS BROKEN DURING USE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12514453 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 7, 2021Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL BROKE OFF WHILE THE PHYSICIAN WAS RETRACTING IT INTO THE MICRO CATHETER. THE BROKEN COIL WAS RETRIEVED USING A GUIDE WIRE THROUGH THE MICRO CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11135616 ↗
  • InjuryDec 28, 2020Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT FIRST COIL WAS DETACHED IN THE ANEURYSM; HOWEVER, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN INSERTED A SECOND COIL, IT WAS NOT ABLE TO ADVANCE THE COIL OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER SINCE TO THE PROXIMAL END OF THE FIRST MAIN COIL WAS STUCK INSIDE THE CATHETER TIP. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL BACK THE CATHETER, THE CATHETER DRAGGED THE FIRST COIL BACK IN THE VESSEL. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE SUPRACLINOID INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) TO HELD DOWN THE COIL TAIL IN THE VESSEL. 90 MINUTES OF SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS NOT AFFECTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11074676 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 24, 2020Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    THE TARGET COIL DIDN'T DEPLOY OUT OF THE CASING; IT DID NOT PUSH OUT OF THE SHEATH. IT DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION, TARGET (PER SITE REPORTER). THEY SENT A (B)(6) LABEL TO RETURN THE DEVICE TO THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10894160 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL (TARGET) PREMATURELY DETACHED IN THE CATHETER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENTS¿ MEDICAL CONDITION WAS GOOD. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10347197 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 21, 2019Fracture; Premature Separation; Fracture; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER AND POSSIBLY FRACTURED FROM THE ANEURYSM. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9360162 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page