Skip to content

ES2 SPINAL SYSTEM 482804750Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · LONG BLADE CANNULATED SCREW · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327002249), received between Jan 24, 2018 and Sep 5, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Migration2
  • Break1
  • Detachment Of Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Injury1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 5, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF AN ES2 INTEGRATED BLADE SCREW DISENGAGED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO REPORTED SURGICAL DELAY AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22982088 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF AN ES2 INTEGRATED BLADE SCREW DISENGAGED FROM THE SCREW INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A 15 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22672369 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 14, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF AN ES2 INTEGRATED BLADE SCREW DISENGAGED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A 10 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22494561 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO ES2 INTEGRATED BLADE SCREWS AT S1 MIGRATED APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY. REVISION SURGERY HAS OCCURRED. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE FIRST OF THE TWO SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10742674 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO ES2 INTEGRATED BLADE SCREWS AT S1 MIGRATED APPROXIMATELY TWO YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY. REVISION SURGERY HAS OCCURRED. THIS REPORT REPRESENTS THE SECOND OF THE TWO SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10742652 ↗
  • InjuryJan 24, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE SCREW BROKE [HEAD DETACHED FROM SHANK]. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE UNIT HAD BEEN ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED A COUPLE WEEKS PRIOR. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY TO REMOVE BROKEN HARDWARE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Injury; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7215255 ↗

Other Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices

All Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.