Trident 542-11-58GRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327037319), received between Dec 26, 2018 and May 15, 2023 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Crack1
- Degraded1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Malposition of Device1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Injury3
- Pain2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Inflammation1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Osteolysis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 15, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY HAD HIS PRIMARY HIP REPLACEMENT REVISED, A STANDARD TRIDENT INSERT AND 32MM FEMORAL HEAD WERE EXPLANTED AND A TRIDENT CONSTRAINED INSERT AND 28MM VITALLIUM FEMORAL HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. REASON FOR THIS REVISION YESTERDAY WAS THAT THE CONSTRAINED INSERT HAD DISLOCATED. THE PATIENT REPORTED TO HOSPITAL AS THE HIP PROSTHESIS IN-SITU HAD DISLOCATED. THE WHOLE TRIDENT CONSTRAINED INSERT HAD DISLOCATED FROM THE TRIDENT SHELL, AND THEN SOMEHOW THE BIPOLAR HEAD HAD DISLOCATED FROM THE INSERT THAT IT HAD BEEN PRE-ASSEMBLED IN. THE BIPOLAR HEAD STILL HAD THE FEMORAL HEAD WITHIN IT, WHICH ITSELF WAS STILL INTACT ON THE ACCOLADE STEM TRUNNION.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 16930319 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ORIGINAL TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT (B)(6) 2010 PATIENT HAD ACETABULAR COMPONENTS AND FEMORAL HEAD REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH TRITANIUM SHELL AND MDM LINER SURGEON RECORDED OSTEOLYSIS AS REASON FOR REVISION ON JOINT REGISTRY FORM. LEFT SIDE.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 13925265 ↗InjuryDec 8, 2021Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
AS PER RECORDS RECEIVED, "ACCORDING TO THE (B)(6) 2019 REVISION OPERATIVE REPORT, HE HAD PERSISTENT PAIN AND WAS REVISED 5 YEARS AGO. AT SURGERY HIS ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS FOUND TO BE IN RETROVERSION. A NEW STRYKER ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS PLACED ALONG WITH NEW STRYKER HEAD ON HIS ACCOLADE STEM."
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12965469 ↗InjuryFeb 27, 2020Fracture; Fracture
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT : "THE TRIDENT RIGHT HIP PROSTHESIS WAS PLACED THE (B)(6) 2007 WITH THE IMPLANTS PROTHEOS. ON (B)(6) 2020 WE PROCEEDED TO CHANGE THE HEAD AND THE INSERT BECAUSE IT BROKE."
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9763354 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2019Crack; Fracture; Crack; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF PAIN. INTRA- OPERATIVELY, BLACK TISSUE AND CERAMIC FRAGMENTS WERE NOTED, AND NO CERAMIC WAS INSIDE OF THE ALUMINA INSERT. THE SHELL, 2 SCREWS, ALUMINA LINER AND ALUMINA HEAD WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED A PRIMARY OPERATIVE REPORT AND IMPLANT SHEET, PRE-REVISION X-RAYS, AND EXPLANT PICTURES.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Injury; Reaction
MAUDE report 8727913 ↗InjuryApr 30, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SHELL LOOSENING. A TRIDENT PSL HA CLUSTER SHELL AND MDM/ ADM LINER CONSTRUCT WERE REVISED. REP REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury
MAUDE report 8565632 ↗InjuryDec 26, 2018Degraded; Degraded
AN 88-YEAR-OLD MAN, BMI 24, PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC WITH COMPLAINTS OF PAIN AND A CRACKING SENSATION IN HIS RIGHT HIP APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS, NINE YEARS POST PRIMARY RIGHT THA. DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, THE PRIMARY COMPONENTS UTILIZED AN ACCOLADE #3 STEM WITH A 127-DEGREE NECK-SHAFT ANGLE AND +5 36MM L-FIT HEAD. RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGES OF THE RIGHT HIP SHOWED AN APPARENT TRUNNION FRACTURE WITH SIGNIFICANT ASYMMETRIC WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE LINER WITHIN THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT. PREOPERATIVE BLOODWORK REVEALED NORMAL LEUKOCYTES AND NORMAL-RANGE C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) AND ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE (ESR). THUS, THE PATIENT WAS CONSENTED FOR REVISION THA FOR A PRESUMED TRUNNION FRACTURE. INTRAOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT REVEALED MARKED HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION ALONG THE GREATER TROCHANTER OF THE RIGHT FEMUR, EXTENDING INTO THE GLUTEUS MAXIMUS, WHICH WAS EXCISED AND DEBRIDED THOROUGHLY. THOUGH THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS INTACT AND SHOWED NO GROSS SIGNS OF WEAR, THERE WAS COMPLETE DISSOCIATION FROM THE FEMORAL STEM. THERE WERE ALSO SIGNIFICANT SIGNS OF METALLOSIS WITH METAL-STAINED DEBRIS AND GRANULATION TISSUE, WHICH EXTENDED DEEP TO THE MARGINS SURROUNDING THE ACETABULAR SHELL. INTERESTIN
Patient problems: Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8195958 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented devices
- LFIT 6260-9-136Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented166 reports
- Trident 623-00-36EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented112 reports
- Accolade 6021-0435Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented88 reports
- EXETER 0580-1-044Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented1 recall22 reports
- Endo-Model SL Knee Prosthesis System 16-2840/02WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented1 recall17 reports
- Endo-Model SL Knee Prosthesis System 16-2840/05WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Uncemented1 recall12 reports
- Trident 623-10-36EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented57 reports
- LFIT 6260-9-336Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented56 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page