Skip to content

Trident 623-00-32GRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 0 Degree Polyethylene Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327039481), received between Dec 13, 2018 and Jun 12, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 12, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A PATIENT THAT ON (B)(6) 2019, HE WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN OBSOLETE STRYKER HIP IMPLANT AND THE PATIENT WANTS CLARIFICATION IF THERE HAS EVER BEEN AN ISSUE WITH THE COMPONENTS IMPLANTED. UPDATE MAY 15, 2020: NO ADVERSE EVENTS. THIS IS AN INQUIRY ABOUT RECALL STATUS. UPDATE: THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY CALLED STRYKER AND COMPLAINED THAT SINCE IMPLANTATION HE HAS HAD PAIN, HIP CLICKING AND DISINTEGRATION OF THE JOINT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 10148102 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2018Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE LINER WOULD NOT SEAT INTO THE ACETABULAR SHELL AND WOULD COME AWAY WITH THE IMPACTOR. STRYKER REP REPORTED THAT THE CASE IS JUST HAPPENING, AND THE CUSTOMER GOT ANOTHER IMPLANT (SAME PRODUCT CODE) AND IT HAS SEATED IN THE SHELL. THERE WAS A DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 15 MINUTES WHILST ATTEMPTING TO SEAT THE PROSTHESIS AND THEN PROCEEDED TO GET ANOTHER IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8160195 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page