Skip to content

Triathlon 5510-F-502Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cruciate Retaining Femoral · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Triathlon (608)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Howmedica Osteonics Triathlon knee implant is a cementless, cruciate-retaining femoral component used in total knee replacement. The 36 reports mostly describe knees that felt unstable or loose, with pain, limited motion, and bone that did not grow into the implant, often requiring revision surgery; some describe the wrong implant being opened or put in without cement. There are 33 injuries and no deaths. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
36
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
33
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 36 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327040302), received between Oct 18, 2018 and Jun 27, 2025 — classified as 33 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unstable” (10 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unstable10
  • Use of Device Problem8
  • Osseointegration Problem5
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Packaging Problem2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1

Patient problems

  • Injury16
  • Pain8
  • Insufficient Information7
  • Inadequate Osseointegration6
  • Loss of Range of Motion5
  • Joint Laxity3
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties2
  • Bone Fracture(s)2

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 36 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 27, 2025Unstable; Unstable

    AS REPORTED: "REV R TKA FEMORAL REVISION FOR INSTABILITY." A SIZE 5 RIGHT CEMENTED CR FEMUR AND 4X10 CS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A SIZE 5 RIGHT TS FEMUR WITH STEM, EXTENDER AND AUGMENTS, AND A 4X11 TS INSERT. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 22349800 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    RIGHT TOTAL KNEE. THE PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION IN THIS KNEE PRIOR TO THE INDEX SURGERY. DUE TO THE INFECTION THE IMPLANTS IN THE INDEX CASE WERE LOOSELY CEMENTED WITH THE INTENT OF CLEARING THE INFECTION AND BEING REVISED TO DEFINITIVE IMPLANTS. A STEM WAS ADDED TO THE TIBIAL COMPONENT TO ADD STABILITY TO THIS CONSTRUCT. SUBSEQUENTLY THE PATIENT FELL AND FRACTURED THEIR DISTAL FEMUR. THE REVISION TODAY WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS THE FRACTURE. PREOP CULTURES WERE NEGATIVE FOR INFECTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE FROM THE DOCTOR OR HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 21343165 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    AS REPORTED: "INCORRECT IMPLANT WAS OPENED AND IMPLANTED. PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK INTO ROOM TO REVISE WITH CORRECT PRESSFIT IMPLANT." CLARIFICATION FROM MPS: ORIGINAL PROCEDURE COMPLETED 'NORMALLY' (NO PROBLEMS YET PERCEIVED); PATIENT WHEELED OUT OF O.R. DISCOVERY MADE. PATIENT WAS WHEELED BACK, REVISION PROCEDURE COMPLETED NORMALLY. NO INTRA-OP DELAYS. TIME BETWEEN ORIGINAL SURGERY AND REVISION WAS 45 MINUTES. RT LEG.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20503560 ↗
  • InjuryJun 13, 2024Unstable; Unstable

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. A CR FEMUR AND CS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A TS FEMUR WITH STEM AND TS INSERT. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 19528700 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2024Mechanical Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Mechanical Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO RANGE OF MOTION ISSUES. A CR FEMUR AND CS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A PS FEMUR WITH TS INSERT. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED INSERT.

    Patient problems: Fibrosis; Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 18823369 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2024Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    PRIMARY PROCEDURE, RIGHT KNEE. KNEE WAS PLANNED FOR SIZE 5 RIGHT PRESSFIT CR FEMUR. A SIZE 5 RIGHT CEMENTED CR FEMUR WAS IMPLANTED. SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED POST-OP. PATIENT HAD LEFT OR, WAS NOTIFIED AND RETURNED FOR REVISION OF THE CEMENTED FEMUR FOR THE PRESSFIT FEMUR THE NEXT DAY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18710885 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: "I COVERED A REVISION KNEE SURGERY TODAY THAT HAD A CEMENTED FEMUR IMPLANTED AS A PRESSFIT FEMUR. I WAS NOT THE REP FOR THE ORIGINAL SURGERY. I DON'T HAVE ANY OF THE IMPLANTS FROM THE SURGERY." SPOKE TO REP. PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED AFTER COMPLAINT OF PAIN, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A CEMENTED FEMUR HAD BEEN IMPLANTED WITHOUT CEMENT IN (B)(6) 2023 DURING A MAKO TKA. FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED PRIMARY USAGE, AND CONFIRMED THAT THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED INSERT, AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 17368420 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    PRIMARY PROCEDURE, RIGHT KNEE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT 1 DAY POST-OP, DISCOVERY WAS MADE THAT A CEMENTED FEMUR WAS IMPLANTED WHEN A PRESS-FIT FEMUR WAS PLANNED. SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED AND PLANS TO REVISE TO A PRESS-FIT FEMUR ON (B)(6) 2023. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON. UPDATE 23 MAY 23 MA: REVISION COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2023 "THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS."

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17103117 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED BY THE KEY ACCOUNTS MANAGER, WHO WAS NOT PRESENT FOR THE SURGERY: PRIMARY PROCEDURE, RIGHT KNEE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED WHEN A PRESS-FIT IMPLANT WAS INTENDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGER: SURGEON'S PROTOCOL IS TO IMPLANT A 'HYBRID' KNEE CONSTRUCT WITH A CEMENTED TIBIA AND PRESS-FIT FEMUR. MPS COVERING THE CASE WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE SURGEON OR THE SURGEON'S PROTOCOL AND SHOWED CEMENTED COMPONENTS TO THE SURGEON (WITH THEIR ASSUMPTION THAT ALL COMPONENTS WOULD BE CEMENTED). SURGEON APPROVED THE IMPLANTS (WITH HIS ASSUMPTION THAT THE TIBIA WOULD BE CEMENTED AND THE FEMUR WOULD BE PRESS-FIT). THE CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED WITHOUT CEMENT. REALIZATION WAS MADE POST-OP AND THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS REVISED THE SAME DAY TO A PRESS-FIT FEMORAL COMPONENT. MANAGER CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17020728 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2023Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED BY THE KEY ACCOUNTS MANAGER, WHO WAS NOT PRESENT FOR THE SURGERY: PRIMARY PROCEDURE, RIGHT KNEE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED WHEN A PRESS-FIT IMPLANT WAS INTENDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGER: SURGEON'S PROTOCOL IS TO IMPLANT A 'HYBRID' KNEE CONSTRUCT WITH A CEMENTED TIBIA AND PRESS-FIT FEMUR. MPS COVERING THE CASE WAS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE SURGEON OR THE SURGEON'S PROTOCOL AND SHOWED CEMENTED COMPONENTS TO THE SURGEON (WITH THEIR ASSUMPTION THAT ALL COMPONENTS WOULD BE CEMENTED). SURGEON APPROVED THE IMPLANTS (WITH HIS ASSUMPTION THAT THE TIBIA WOULD BE CEMENTED AND THE FEMUR WOULD BE PRESS-FIT). THE CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS IMPLANTED WITHOUT CEMENT. REALIZATION WAS MADE POST-OP AND THE PATIENT'S FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS REVISED THE SAME DAY TO A PRESS-FIT FEMORAL COMPONENT. MANAGER CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17020726 ↗
  • InjuryOct 28, 2022Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO A CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT HAVING BEEN IMPLANTED IN A KNEE PREPPED FOR PRESS-FIT. REPORTING REP WAS NOT PRESENT FOR THE INDEX PROCEDURE. REP CONFIRMED THAT HE MAY BE ABLE TO SUPPLY SOME PATIENT DETAILS, DATE OF IMPLANT, AND IMPLANT DETAILS. OTHERWISE, THE REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15694233 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PLEASE FIND INFORMATION FROM A REVISION OF RIGHT TOTAL KNEE DONE TODAY. REVISION WAS DONE DUE TO LOOSE PAINFUL FEMORAL COMPONENT. PHOTOS ARE OF IMPLANTS THAT WERE REMOVED, THE SIZE 5 UNIVERSAL BASEPLATE WAS NOT REVISED, NO OTHER INFORMATION ON PREVIOUS SURGERY AVAILABLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM DOCTOR OR HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 15050858 ↗
  • InjuryJan 14, 2022Unstable; Unstable

    RIGHT KNEE REVISED FOR INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 13257868 ↗
  • InjuryNov 15, 2021Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    PRIMARY RIGHT MAKO KNEE. POST-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS PUT INTO A KNEE PLANNED FOR A PRESS-FIT FEMORAL COMPONENT. SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED AND 1 DAY POST-OP, THE COMPONENT WAS REMOVED AND A CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS CEMENTED IN. REP CONFIRMED THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE PACKAGE LABELING OR THE PACKAGE CONTENTS OF THE ORIGINAL IMPLANT. REP ALSO CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12814345 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. PRE-OPERATIVELY, THE SURGEON SUSPECTED THE CAUSE OF PAIN TO BE FEMORAL LOOSENING AND OSTEOLYSIS DUE TO POLY WEAR, DUE TO LUCENCY SEEN ON X-RAY. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THOUGH NOTED TO NOT BE GROSSLY LOOSE, THE EXISTENCE OR DEGREE OF LOOSENESS OF THE CEMENTED FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE REP. THE POLY HAD NO VISIBLE WEAR. REP IS REQUESTING INVESTIGATION RESULTS ON THE INSERT, WHICH IS ALLEGEDLY BEING RETURNED. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A SIZE 4 PS FEMUR WITH A 5X10 INSERT. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 11642743 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE SUBMISSION OF A REVISION THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED. A SIZE 5 RIGHT CR FEMUR AND 5X9 CS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A SIZE 6 RIGHT TS FEMUR WITH A STEM AND 4 AUGMENTS AND A 5X13 PS INSERT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 10779501 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO FLEXION CONTRACTURE. THE PATIENT'S CR KNEE WAS REVISED TO AN MRH KNEE (PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS RETAINED). REP PROVIDED THE REVISION USAGE SHEET AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 10654378 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2020Unstable; Loss of Osseointegration; Unstable; Loss of Osseointegration

    INFORMATION RECEIVED IN FOLLOW-UP INCLUDES AN OPERATIVE REPORT FOR A RIGHT KNEE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2018. NOTED IN THE RECORDS ARE THE FOLLOWING: "HAD A FALL. SHE IS NOW HAVING SYMPTOMS OF PAIN AND PRESENTED TODAY FOR OPERATIVE INTERVENTION FAILED RIGHT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WITH PATELLAR LOOSENING, INSTABILITY, AND EXTENSOR MECHANISM COMPROMISE. THE PATIENT'S PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS GROSSLY LOOSE AND FREE-FLOATING." A CR FEMUR, CS INSERT, AND TRIATHLON PATELLA WERE REVISED TO A TS FEMORAL COMPONENT WITH A STEM AND 4 AUGMENTS, A PS INSERT, AND A COMPETITOR PATELLA.

    Patient problems: Fall; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 10206338 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THIS PI WAS RAISED FROM A MEDICAL REVIEW FOR PI. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2016 FOR A PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE OF THE FEMUR. NO COMPONENTS WERE EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 9285957 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2019Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    A TRIATHLON IMPLANT TRIATHLON-CR FEM CEMENT #5 RT WHICH WAS EXPOSED TO WATER AND STEAM AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL, WAS REDISTRIBUTED BY STRYKER (B)(4) AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL. A FULL LOAN TRIATHLON IMPLANT SET WAS ACCIDENTALLY RETRIEVED FROM A HOSPITAL BY A COURIER AND WAS RETURNED TO A STRYKER KIT ROOM. HOWEVER, THE COURIER WAS UNAWARE THAT THE ITEMS WERE AFFECTED AND THEREFORE DID NOT COMMUNICATE TO THE KIT ROOM THAT THESE PARTS WERE PREVIOUSLY QUARANTINED AT THE HOSPITAL. AS A RESULT THE KIT ROOM DID NOT PROCEED WITH ANY QUARANTINE ACTION AND 18 OF THE AFFECTED ITEMS WERE RE-DISTRIBUTED. UPDATE 19/AUGUST/2019 WG: NONE OF THE PACKAGING WAS RETAINED FROM THE IMPLANTED DEVICES. SURGEONS EXPRESSED NO CONCERN, AND HAVE COMMUNICATED NO PLANS TO SURGICALLY ADDRESS THE IMPLANTATION OF THE DEVICES. TO DATE, NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN REPORTED FOR THESE PATIENTS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8974367 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2019Unstable; Unstable

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE COMMUNICATION OF AN ATTORNEY THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO RIGHT KNEE CORONAL PLANE INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8879891 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE COMMUNICATION OF AN ATTORNEY THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FAILED RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, MECHANICAL LOOSENING OF COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 8879406 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2019Unstable; Unstable

    THIS PI IS FOR THE RIGHT KNEE. IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE COMMUNICATION OF AN ATTORNEY THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO RIGHT AND LEFT KNEE POSTOPERATIVE TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY WITH INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8878771 ↗
  • InjuryMay 28, 2019Unstable; Unstable

    DR. REVISED PATIENT'S FEMORAL COMPONENT DUE TO FLEXION INSTABILITY. CONVERTED TO A TRIATHLON TS FEMORAL COMPONENT.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8646621 ↗
  • InjuryMay 7, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT'S DAUGHTER STATED HER MOTHER HAD A RIGHT KNEE REPLACEMENT 4 YEARS AGO AND IT RECENTLY FAILED. PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING PAIN. PATIENT IS SCHEDULED FOR REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018 TO COMPETITIVE DEVICES. REASON FOR REVISION IS LOOSENING. PATIENT WILL ALSO LIKE TO KNOW IF HER IMPLANT WERE PART OF A RECALL.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8588483 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page