Triathlon 5536-B-300Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Tibial Component · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Triathlon (608)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Howmedica Triathlon tibial component is the plastic-and-metal base plate used in total knee replacement. The 47 reports mostly describe the tibial piece loosening or sinking into the bone, the implant not growing into bone properly, the knee feeling unstable, and in one case a broken-off piece of the base plate, with patients needing revision surgery for pain, instability or fracture. There were no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 47
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 47
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 47 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327041484), received between Jul 10, 2017 and Mar 3, 2026 — classified as 47 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration10
- Insufficient Device Problem Information9
- Loss of Osseointegration8
- Unstable8
- Osseointegration Problem7
- Fracture4
- Unintended Movement4
- Degraded3
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration14
- Injury14
- Pain12
- Bone Fracture(s)8
- Joint Laxity8
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties6
- Insufficient Information6
- Fall4
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 47 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 3, 2026Fracture
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND FLEXION INSTABILITY. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, SIGNIFICANT INSERT WEAR WAS NOTED POSTERIORLY/ MEDIALLY, AND A PORTION OF THE BASEPLATE WAS BROKEN OFF (SURGEON REPORTED POSSIBLE CAUSE/ CONTRIBUTOR WAS THAT THE BASEPLATE WAS IMPLANTED WITH TOO MUCH POSTERIOR SLOPE). A CR/ CS KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO A TS KNEE (PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS RETAINED). REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain
MAUDE report 24494749 ↗InjurySep 17, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
REVISED A LEFT CR/CS CEMENTLESS TRIATHLON DUE TO TIBIAL LOOSENING. HE REVISED TO A CEMENTED PS TRIATHLON WITH TIBIAL STEM AND AUGMENTS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23080598 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2025Unstable; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Unstable; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO FLEXION INSTABILITY, TIBIAL SUBSIDENCE AND TIBIAL LOOSENING. A CR/ CS KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO TS KNEE. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 22414539 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO POSTERIOR SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE. A CR KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO A PS KNEE. REP CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED INSERT AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21394565 ↗InjurySep 16, 2024Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. ADDITIONALLY, SURGEON REPORTED HE WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH COMPONENT ALIGNMENT. A CR/ CS KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO A TS KNEE (PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS RETAINED). REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 20233631 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO TIBIAL LOOSENING. A CR/ CS KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO A TS KNEE WITH TRIATHLON REVISION BASEPLATE. REP CAN PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE REVISED IMPLANTS, OTHERWISE CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 19526496 ↗InjuryMay 28, 2024Unstable; Unstable
PATIENT FELL SEVERAL WEEKS POST PRIMARY WITH SUBSEQUENT ISSUES WITH STABILITY RESULTING IN REPEATED FALLS LEADING TO REVISION. PER REVISION OP REPORT: "SURGICAL FINDINGS: INSTABILITY, LOOSE FEMUR AND TIBIAL COMPONENT WITH FIBROUS IN-GROWTH".
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19403256 ↗InjuryMay 9, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
AS REPORTED: "PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO LACK OF RANGE OF MOTION. NO OTHER INFO AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY." REP CONFIRMED A BASEPLATE AND INSERT WERE REVISED (STEM FROM INDEX PROCEDURE WAS ON THE FEMORAL COMPONENT).
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 19276978 ↗InjuryMar 28, 2024Unstable; Migration; Unstable; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN, INSTABILITY, AND SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE (APPROXIMATELY 1 CM INTO VARUS). A CR/ CS KNEE WAS CONVERTED TO A TS KNEE WITH AUGMENTS, STEMS AND A PATELLAR COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain
MAUDE report 19001036 ↗InjuryMar 22, 2024Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED BECAUSE THE KNEE WAS IN VARUS. A TRIATHLON PS KNEE WAS REVISED TO A TRIATHLON TS KNEE WITH STEMS AND AUGMENTS. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18957856 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2024Degraded; Fracture; Unstable; Degraded; Fracture; Unstable
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO GLOBAL INSTABILITY AND PAIN. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE FOLLOWING WERE OBSERVED: THE LOCKING WIRE OF THE INSERT BROKE, AND THE INSERT DISLODGED FROM THE BASEPLATE. THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS ARTICULATING POSTERIORLY, CAUSING INSERT WEAR AND METALLOSIS DUE TO ARTICULATING WITH THE BASEPLATE. THE BASEPLATE'S POSTERIOR MEDIAL PORTION WAS BROKEN OFF. PATIENT'S ACTIVITY LEVEL WAS NORMAL, NO TRAUMA REPORTED. THE PATIENT'S CR KNEE (INCLUDING PATELLAR COMPONENT) WAS CONVERTED TO A TS KNEE. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Joint Laxity; Pain
MAUDE report 18814725 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2024Unstable; Unstable
PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TKA ON (B)(6) 2019. THE PATIENT DEVELOPED MECHANICAL INSTABILITY AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2023. ALL COMPONENTS WHERE EXCHANGED EXCEPT THE PATELLA.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 18785565 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
RIGHT TOTAL KNEE. THE REVISION TODAY WAS SECONDARY TO PAIN AROUND THE TIBIAL IMPLANT. ON X-RAY THERE WAS THE APPEARANCE OF LOOSENING AROUND THE TIBIA. IN SURGERY THE TIBIA WAS NOT LOOSE BUT THE DECISION WAS MADE TO REVISE IT DUE TO THE PATIENT¿S COMPLAINT OF PAIN IN THAT AREA. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM THE DOCTOR OR HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 18279589 ↗InjuryNov 1, 2023Fracture; Osseointegration Problem; Fracture; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND SUSPECTED BONE LOOSENING BASED ON INDICATIONS SEEN IN BONE SCAN. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE IMPLANTS DID NOT APPEAR TO BE GROSSLY LOOSE. A TIBIAL BASEPLATE AND INSERT WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED INSERT.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 18048621 ↗InjuryOct 26, 2023Migration; Migration
REVISED A TIBIAL INSERT AND CEMENTLESS BASEPLATE DUE TO PATIENT FALLING AND TIBIA SUBSIDING MEDIALLY. REPLACED WITH A UNIVERSAL BASEPLATE WITH STEM.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 18016880 ↗InjurySep 24, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO TIBIAL LOOSENING AND IMPLANT COLLAPSING INTO VALGUS. SURGEON SUSPECTED THE PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS LOOSE. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS NOT NOTED TO BE LOOSE BUT THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE IT OUT OF AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION. THE PATELLAR COMPONENT, BASEPLATE, AND INSERT WERE REVISED. SURGEON REVISED TO A THICKER INSERT TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ADDITIONAL RESECTED BONE. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 17805303 ↗InjuryMar 29, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Loss of Osseointegration; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THIS PI FOR THE RIGHT KNEE AS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT:: RIGHT KNEE: (B)(6), 2018: PRIMARY RIGHT KNEE STRYKER IMPLANT (B)(6) 2019: REVISION, RIGHT KNEE, STRYKER IMPLANT - REASON UNKNOWN POSSIBLE SECOND REVISION OF THE RIGHT KNEE, DATE TO DETERMINE -REASON UNKNOWN- (B)(6) 2023: DAUGHTER CONFIRMED THAT RIGHT KNEE REVISION WILL BE IN 2-3 MONTHS. THE SURGEON WOULD LIKE TO MINIMIZE THE RISK OF BLOOD CLOTS BY WAITING TO DO THE REVISION. LEFT KNEE: (B)(6) 2020:PRIMARY LEFT KNEE STRYKER IMPLANT (B)(6), 2022: PATIENT REPORTS PAIN, A BONE SCAN WAS PERFORMED (B)(6) 2023: DR CONFIRMED THAT HER IMPLANTS ¿FELL APART.¿ LEFT KNEE REVISION REQUIRED, REVISION SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2023. DAUGHTER IS NOT SURE IF THAT IS EVEN POSSIBLE (IMPLANTS FALLING APART) AND WOULD LIKE IT INVESTIGATED. (B)(6) 2023 UPDATE : DAUGHTER CONFIRMED HER MOTHER HAD REVISION SURGERY OF THE LEFT KNEE ON (B)(6) 2023 AND SHE IS CURRENTLY EXPERIENCING INCREASED PAIN SINCE THE PROCEDURE. DAUGHTER STATED HER MOTHER'S QUALITY LIFE HAS DIMINISHED SINCE THE MULTIPLE REVISIONS. UPDATE: (B)(6) 2023. PER REVISION OP REPORT, REVISION WAS DUE TO ASEPTIC TIBIAL LOOSENING. ONLY THE BASEPLATE AND INSERT WERE REVISED UPDATE: PER OP REPORT: PAT
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16633578 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2022Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE AND PCL ISSUES. FEMORAL COMPONENT, INSERT, AND BASEPLATE WERE REVISED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15892157 ↗InjuryAug 22, 2022Unintended Movement; Migration; Unintended Movement; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "PATIENT HAD HER TIBIA AND POLY REVISED DUE TO SUBSIDENCE." REP PROVIDED AN X-RAY, PRIMARY AND REVISION USAGE SHEETS. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15263738 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
REVISION WAS PERFORMED FOR COMPLAINT OF PAIN AND OBSERVATION OF POSSIBLE TIBIAL LOOSENING ON BONE SCAN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE FROM THE DOCTOR OR HOSPITAL." SPOKE TO REP. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, SURGEON REPORTED THERE WAS SOME IMPLANT LOOSENING. A BASEPLATE AND 3X10 CS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A BASEPLATE WITH STEM, 3X14 CS INSERT, AND THE PATIENT'S NATIVE (BONE) PATELLA WAS RESURFACED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15127641 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2022Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE (POSSIBLE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR FOR SUBSIDENCE NOT REPORTED TO REP). A BASEPLATE AND POLY INSERT WERE REVISED TO A BASEPLATE, STEM, AND POLY INSERT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14198017 ↗InjuryFeb 2, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
REVISED A TRIATHLON CEMENTLESS LEFT TOTAL KNEE DUE TO A PATIENT FALL AND PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. HE REMOVED THE FEMORAL AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS AND REPLACED WITH A STRYKER TIBIAL CONE AND COMPETITOR TOTAL KNEE REVISION IMPLANTS. SMALL FRACTURE IN THE TIBIA.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall
MAUDE report 13423228 ↗InjuryJan 31, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE LOCKING WIRE OF THE INSERT WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE BROKEN. THOUGH THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS WELL-FIXED, IT WAS REVISED IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE BASEPLATE. THE PATELLA WAS RETAINED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 13404979 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
PATIENT REPORTED SHE HAD A LEFT TKA ON (B)(6) 2018. PATIENT STATED THAT SINCE HER SURGERY SHE HAS EXPERIENCED SWELLING AND PAIN. PATIENT HAD X-RAYS DONE AND WAS TOLD BY HER SURGEON THAT HER KNEE WAS LOOSE AND SHE REQUIRES REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 13366028 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2022Unstable; Unintended Movement; Unstable; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO FLEXION INSTABILITY, GLOBAL INSTABILITY, AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE SUBSIDENCE. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE FOLLOWING WERE NOTED: THE LOCKING WIRE OF THE INSERT WAS BROKEN AT BOTH LOCKING POINTS OF THE BASEPLATE, POSTEROMEDIAL WEAR WAS NOTED ON THE INSERT, AND A PIECE OF THE INSERT (ABOUT THE SIZE OF A DIME) HAD BROKEN OFF THE POSTEROMEDIAL PORTION. THE BASEPLATE, INSERT, AND FEMORAL COMPONENT WERE REVISED TO COMPETITOR DEVICES (NO ALLEGATIONS WERE MADE AGAINST THE FEMORAL COMPONENT), THE PATELLAR COMPONENT WAS RETAINED.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 13235391 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1512-14-050Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER106 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-205Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall53 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-105Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall46 reports
- ATTUNE 1547-06-001Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall37 reports
- ATTUNE 1513-12-060Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER72 reports
- Triathlon 5521-B-300Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- Triathlon 5531-G-709-EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- ATTUNE 1512-16-080Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page