Skip to content

Triathlon 5551-L-320Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Patella · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Triathlon (608)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327049855), received between Aug 24, 2017 and Sep 7, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Off-Label Use1
  • Osseointegration Problem1
  • Packaging Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Injury2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 7, 2020Off-Label Use; Osseointegration Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Off-Label Use; Osseointegration Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    GAVE SURGEON THE WRONG IMPLANT. CEMENTED PATELLA WAS PUT IN, IN AN UNCEMENTED NATURE. A SECOND SURGERY IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE PATELLA AND PLACE A CORRECT PATELLA.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 10499243 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2017Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Packaging Problem; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Packaging Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN PERFORMING A PRIMARY IMPLANT FOR PATIENT'S KNEE (SIDE UNKNOWN), A HAIR WAS FOUND ON THE UNDERSIDE OF THE PATELLA IMPLANT UPON REMOVING IT FROM THE INNER PACKAGE. SURGEON ELECTED NOT TO USE THE IMPLANT DUE TO STERILITY CONCERNS. ANOTHER IMPLANT WAS IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE AND NO SURGICAL DELAY WAS CAUSED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7147568 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION OF HIS RIGHT MEDIAL UNI-COMPARTMENT TO A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2016. HE FURTHER ALLEGES THAT HE CONTINUES TO HAVE PAIN AND LOOSENING OF HIS KNEE COMPONENT. HE SCHEDULED FOR A SECOND REVISION. SALES REP REPORTED A PRIMARY REVISION OF A RIGHT TOTAL KNEE DUE TO LOOSE TIBIAL TRAY. NO TRAUMA OR DELAY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 6817733 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page