UniVise 48590040Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION PLATE · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327065657), received between Sep 1, 2016 and Jul 17, 2017 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Align” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Align2
- Mechanical Problem2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 17, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; THE CUSTOMER REPORTED AN ISSUE WITH A 40MM PLATE. DURING THE CASE, THE IMPLANT WAS PLACED READY TO BE FIXED. AT THIS POINT, THE SURGEON, COMMENTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS NOT COMPRESSING PROPERLY TO FIX TO THE SPINOUS PROCESSES WHEN HE WAS ROTATING THE INSTRUMENT THAT IS USED TO DO SO. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER OF THE SAME IMPLANT. THERE WERE A COUPLE OF MINUTES SURGICAL DELAY ONLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6719993 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2016Mechanical Problem; Failure to Align; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; CENTER LOCKING NUT WAS OFF TRACK, WOULD NOT LOCK ONTO PATIENTS SPINOUS PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5920691 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2016Mechanical Problem; Failure to Align; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; CENTER LOCKING NUT WAS OFF TRACK, WOULD NOT LOCK ONTO PATIENTS SPINOUS PROCESS.
Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5920690 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page