REUNION 5569-P-2013Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · PRESS-FIT HUMERAL STEM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of REUNION (113)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327098143), received between May 23, 2018 and Feb 1, 2022 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Microbial Contamination of Device1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Discomfort3
- Rash3
- Bacterial Infection1
- Failure of Implant1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 1, 2022Unstable; Unstable
AS REPORTED: "SHOULDER INSTABILITY. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE SHOULDER STEM AND HUMERAL CUP AND INSERT." REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13419038 ↗InjuryMar 21, 2019Microbial Contamination of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A STAGE 1 REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S LEFT SHOULDER WAS PERFORMED DUE TO INFECTION. SURGEON REPORTED INFECTION AS MRSA. PATIENT'S ENTIRE SHOULDER CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED AND A SPACER WAS PLACED. REP REPORTED THAT THE HOSPITAL AND SURGEON WILL NOT RELEASE ANY FURTHER INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection
MAUDE report 8441693 ↗InjuryAug 7, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT SHOULDER WAS REVISED DUE TO THE HUMERAL HEAD BECOMING DISASSOCIATED FROM THE STEM. THE STEM WAS REPORTED TO HAVE COUNTER-SUNK INTO THE PATIENT'S HUMERUS. THE SURGEON STATED THAT NO TRAUMA (FALL, ETC) HAD BEEN REPORTED BY THE PATIENT. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A LARGER STEM AND SAME-SIZED HUMERAL HEAD.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 7756242 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS A RESULT OF A SHOULDER INJURY IN (B)(6) 2015, PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY USING A STRYKER REUNION RSA. THE RECOVERY WENT WELL, AND THE PATIENT HAD AN ACCEPTABLE ROM DESPITE SOME HO ON THE TOP OF THE HUMERUS. AT THE END OF 2016 PATIENT STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PERIODS OF DISCOMFORT. EVENT 1 OF 3 AS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT¿ AT THE END OF 2016, I STARTED EXPERIENCE PERIODS OF DISCOMFORT AND IN EARLY (B)(6) A SPIDER-WEB LOOKING RASH APPEARED AROUND THE UPPER INCISION AREA. THEN AT THE END OF (B)(6) A ¼ INCH DIAMETER, FLUID FILLED CYST APPEARED AT THE UPPER END OF THE INCISION. AFTER 7 ¿ 10 DAYS THE CYST DRIED UP LEAVING A DEPRESSION, BUT THE RASH REMAINED. TWO WEEKS LATER, THE CYST REAPPEARED IN THE SAME SPOT BUT WAS NOW ½ INCH IN DIAMETER. IT AGAIN DRIED UP OVER THE NEXT 7 ¿ 10 DAYS LEAVING A LARGER DEPRESSION. TWO WEEKS LATER THE CYST REAPPEARED, THIS TIME ABOUT ¾ INCH IN DIAMETER. PATIENT MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIS SURGEON WHO, IN HIS YEARS OF EXPERIENCE, HAD NEVER SEEN CYST LIKE THIS ASSOCIATE WITH AN INCISION. AFTER A BLOOD TEST PROVED NEGATIVE FOR INFECTION, HE RECOMMENDED EXPLORATORY SURGERY WHICH WAS UNDERTAKEN ON (B)(6) 2017.¿ ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES
Patient problems: Discomfort; Rash
MAUDE report 7575894 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS A RESULT OF A SHOULDER INJURY IN (B)(6) 2015, PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY USING A STRYKER REUNION RSA. THE RECOVERY WENT WELL, AND THE PATIENT HAD AN ACCEPTABLE ROM DESPITE SOME HO ON THE TOP OF THE HUMERUS. AT THE END OF 2016 PATIENT STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PERIODS OF DISCOMFORT. EVENT 2 OF 3 AS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT: SINCE THAT TIME, THE CYST HAS NOT RETURNED; HOWEVER, LEVEL OF DISCOMFORT HAS INCREASED, AND MY ROM HAS GRADUALLY DECREASED. THE RASH HAS PERSISTED FOR THE LAST YEAR AND APPEARS TO BE DYNAMIC ¿ IT FADES SLIGHTLY WHEN I AM LESS ACTIVE (OVERNIGHT) AND INTENSIFIES WHEN I AM ACTIVE. THE RASH APPEARS AS A FLOW OF RED LINES EMANATING FROM THE SITE OF THE CYST. IN (B)(6) 2007, I MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH AN ALLERGIST WHO PERFORMED A STANDARD PATCH TEST. IT SHOWED THAT I HAD AN ALLERGY TO NICKEL, BUT NOT TO TITANIUM, ZIRCONIUM, COBALT AND CHROMIUM. I UNDERSTAND THAT THE STRYKER UNIT CONSISTS OF THREE DIFFERENT METALS: THREE PARTS MADE OF (B)(4), ONE PART MADE OF (B)(4), AND ONE PART MADE OF (B)(4).
Patient problems: Discomfort; Rash
MAUDE report 7575849 ↗InjuryJun 6, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS A RESULT OF A SHOULDER INJURY IN (B)(6) 2015, PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVERSE TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY USING A STRYKER REUNION RSA. THE RECOVERY WENT WELL, AND THE PATIENT HAD AN ACCEPTABLE ROM DESPITE SOME HO ON THE TOP OF THE HUMERUS. AT THE END OF 2016 PATIENT STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PERIODS OF DISCOMFORT. EVENT 3 OF 3: AS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT¿ A SERUM TEST IN (B)(6) FOR COBALT AND CHROMIUM INDICATED A SLIGHT ABOVE NORMAL LEVEL OF COBALT (BUT LESS THAN 1 PPB). DURING MY SIX-MONTH SURGERY FOLLOW UP (B)(6) 2018, ALL BLOOD TESTS WERE NORMAL, AND THE X-RAYS SHOWED NOTHING ABNORMAL. THE SURGEON WAS STILL BAFFLED BY THE RASH AND SUGGESTED THAT THE PATIENT GETS IN TOUCH WITH A DERMATOLOGIST TO SEE IF A BIOPSY MIGHT REVEAL SOMETHING. THE BIOPSY RESULTS WERE AS FOLLOWS: SPARSE PERIVASCULAR AND INTERSTITIAL DERMATITIS, WITH HISTIOCYTES, MAST CELLS, AND SCATTERED EOSINOPHILS. THE DERMATOLOGIST PRESCRIBED TREATMENT WITH CLOBETASOL PROPIONATE, BUT THAT SEEMED TO INTENSIFY THE RASH.¿
Patient problems: Discomfort; Rash
MAUDE report 7575844 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A STAGE 1 REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON PATIENT'S LEFT SHOULDER DUE TO INFECTION (REPORTED BY SURGEON, UNKNOWN IF CLINICALLY CONFIRMED, UNKNOWN IF INFECTING MICROORGANISM WAS IDENTIFIED). REP REPORTED THAT X-RAYS, MEDICAL RECORDS, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE NOT AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7539089 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page