Skip to content

TARGET M0036182050Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · XXL 360 Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET (114)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327128345), received between Oct 17, 2018 and Jun 15, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation4
  • Break3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
  • Headache1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE ADVANCING THE SUBJECT COIL WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SHAFT, MAKING FURTHER ADVANCEMENT DIFFICULT. WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RETRIEVE THE SUBJECT COIL, IT BECAME PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE SHAFT. THEREFORE, BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED FROM THE BODY AND REPLACED WITH NEW ONES OF THE SAME TYPE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25505622 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 16, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE OF THE LEFT GONADAL VEIN, THE PHYSICIAN OBSERVED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS NOT POSITIONING PROPERLY. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO RETRIEVE THE SUBJECT COIL UNDER FLUOROSCOPY, BUT THE SUBJECT MAIN COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED AND REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24350306 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS ADVANCED THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH AND SHAFT OF MICROCATHETER AND THE SUBJECT COIL GOT PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY BY REPLACING THE SUBJECT DEVICE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21712988 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND THE 4 COILS (SUBJECT DEVICE) WERE IMPLANTED. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT SUFFERED SEVERE HEADACHE & INCREASING COMPRESSION SYMPTOMS (ABDUCENS NERVE). THREE WEEK CORTISONE THERAPY WAS PRESCRIBED TO CURE THE ADVERSE EVENT AND THE ADVERSE EVENT OF HEADACHE WAS RESOLVED IN 5 DAYS.

    Patient problems: Headache; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14109859 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN ADVANCING THE SUBJECT 5TH COIL THROUGH THE MICROCATHETER, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND THE COIL GOT STUCK; THEREFORE, THE COIL WAS REMOVED. UPON REMOVAL FROM THE MICROCATHETER, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS BROKEN. ANOTHER COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9079072 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8667404 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 25, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED BECAUSE THE SUBJECT COIL SIZE DID NOT MATCH ANEURYSM, IT WAS STUCK IN THE HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER AND IT WAS BROKEN. THEREFORE, IT WAS CHANGED THE NEW SAME ONE AND THE OPERATION WAS CONTINUED. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8007178 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 17, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE COIL WAS BROKEN DURING INSERTION. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7976038 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page