TARGET M0036181850Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · XXL 360 Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327128413), received between Sep 28, 2017 and Apr 9, 2020 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Premature Separation2
- Expulsion1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
- Unintended Movement1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Vasoconstriction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 9, 2020Expulsion; Unintended Movement; Premature Separation; Expulsion; Unintended Movement; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL HAD PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. IT WAS ALSO IDENTIFIED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL APPEARED PROTRUDING AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY FIXED SUBCUTANEOUSLY BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9942072 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE COIL(SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS ADVANCED IN THE MICROCATHETER, THE COIL DETACHED PREMATURELY INSIDE THE MICRO CATHETER. THE COIL WAS RETRIEVED ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8471750 ↗InjurySep 28, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
DURING THE EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE AGAINST TYPE II ENDOLEAK AFTER ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL GOT STUCK AND STRETCHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER DURING PLACEMENT IN AN INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY ANEURYSM. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE COIL TOGETHER WITH THE MICROCATHETER BUT IT DID NOT WORK. THEREFORE, A SNARE DEVICE WAS USED BUT STILL DID NOT WORK. FINALLY THE PHYSICIAN CUT OFF THE COIL, PART OF THE MAIN COIL WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT LOCATED FROM ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM TO INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED DUE TO 3 HOURS HAD PASSED SINCE COIL RETRIEVING STARTED AND THE INFERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY BECAME SPASM. THE PATIENT CONDITION IS FINE BUT IS UNDER OBSERVATION AT THE MOMENT.
Patient problems: Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 6901429 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page