Skip to content

NA 78-50020Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · PEEK Customized Cranial Implant Prio, M · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327129281), received between Jun 8, 2021 and May 28, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size3
  • Nonstandard Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 28, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRANIOPLASTY PROCEDURE, A SIGNIFICANT IMPLANT FIT CONCERN WAS IDENTIFIED INVOLVING THE PEEK IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25315226 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 21, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WITHIN THE PEEK STUDY 2023, THE IMPLANT REQUIRED SLIGHT ADJUSTMENT DUE TO A CHANGE OF ANATOMY/CALCIFICATIONS. THIS CAUSED A DELAY OF 10 MINUTES. THE PATIENT WAS INVOLVED, BUT NO PATIENT IMPACT OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED AT INTAKE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24131040 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2023Nonstandard Device; Nonstandard Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS MANUFACTURED AND DID NOT MEET THE THICKNESS SPECIFICATIONS. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EVENTS HOWEVER, THIS PRODUCT FAILURE COULD CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO AN ADVERSE EVENT SHOULD IT HAPPEN AGAIN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18121963 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 8, 2021Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON STATED THEY WERE UNHAPPY WITH THE FIT AND CONTOUR OF THE IMPLANT. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS KNOWN AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11957348 ↗

Other Plate, cranioplasty, preformed, alterable devices

All Plate, cranioplasty, preformed, alterable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page