Skip to content

N/A LF1212ARecalls & reported problems

Stryker Sustainability Solutions, Inc. · Class 2

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327565300), received between Oct 17, 2025 and Oct 17, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 3 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520263
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Contamination3
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection3

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • Unspecified Infection3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 17, 2025Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REPROCESSED LIGASURE FAILED. IT WAS NOTICED BY THE PHYSICIAN THAT THE HYSTERECTOMY INFECTION THAT HE ASSISTED WITH HAD USED A REPROCESSED LIGASURE DEVICE DURING THE CASE. THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT AWARE OF ANY PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED PROCEDURE TIME. THESE ARE COMMONLY USED DEVICES THAT ARE READILY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23330399 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2025Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REPROCESSED LIGASURE FAILED. IT WAS NOTICED BY THE PHYSICIAN THAT THE HYSTERECTOMY INFECTION THAT HE ASSISTED WITH HAD USED A REPROCESSED LIGASURE DEVICE DURING THE CASE. THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT AWARE OF ANY PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED PROCEDURE TIME. THESE ARE COMMONLY USED DEVICES THAT ARE READILY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23330397 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2025Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Contamination; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REPROCESSED LIGASURE FAILED. IT WAS NOTICED BY THE PHYSICIAN THAT THE HYSTERECTOMY INFECTION THAT HE ASSISTED WITH HAD USED A REPROCESSED LIGASURE DEVICE DURING THE CASE. THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT AWARE OF ANY PATIENT INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED PROCEDURE TIME. THESE ARE COMMONLY USED DEVICES THAT ARE READILY AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23330395 ↗

Other Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation accessories, laparoscopic & endoscopic, reprocessed devices

All Electrosurgical, cutting & coagulation accessories, laparoscopic & endoscopic, reprocessed devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.