Skip to content

Target Tetra TG5413060Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Target Tetra (19)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327578652), received between Dec 20, 2023 and Apr 21, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation5
  • Fracture1
  • Misassembled1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2026Premature Separation

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED/SEPARATED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPORTED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE BODY AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SIZE. THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24942520 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS PUSHED THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH ALIGNED WITH THE MICROCATHETER HUB AND RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND IT COULD NOT ADVANCE. AFTER SLIGHTLY RETRACTING, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT COIL HAD BECOME STRETCHED, AND THE SUBJECT COIL FOUND TO BE PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23357187 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2025Misassembled; Premature Separation; Misassembled; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS INSERTED INTO THE ANEURYSM AND THE OPERATOR ATTEMPTED TO ALIGN THE MARKERS, THE ENTIRE SUBJECT COIL CAME OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER PREMATURELY. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED. THE MISALIGNMENT WITH THE MARKER WAS SO LARGE THAT THE MICROCATHETER WAS LEFT IN PLACE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A NEW COIL. THERE WERE NO MISALIGNMENT ISSUES BETWEEN THE MICROCATHETER AND NEW COIL. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21284650 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19715091 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 21, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RUPTURED ANEURYSM PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL COULD NOT BE DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED THE POWER SUPPLY HOWEVER, THE SUBJECT COIL STILL COULD NOT BE DETACHED. PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL THE DELIVERY WIRE TO RETRIEVE THE SUBJECT COIL AND THE SUBJECT COIL GOT PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE PROXIMAL END OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE PREMATURELY DETACHED SUBJECT COIL INTO THE ANEURYSM USING THE COIL DELIVERY WIRE. THE COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS THEN REMOVED. SINCE, IT WAS A SMALL ANEURYSM, EMBOLIZATION WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ONLY ONE COIL. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19586657 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18367010 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page