Skip to content

Target Tetra TG5413080Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Target Tetra (19)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327578669), received between Jan 23, 2024 and Feb 9, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture7
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7
  • Foreign Body In Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL DETACHED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24292025 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL SEEN TO BE BROKEN/FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23491626 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 4, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND WAS EXAMINED. DURING DEVICE INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21778839 ↗
  • InjuryMar 11, 2025Fracture; Migration; Fracture; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOMA) ANEURYSM PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR PERFORMED STENT ASSISTED COILING. THE SUBJECT COIL FAILED TO DETACH EVEN WITH NEW POWER SUPPLY. WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL AND MICROCATHETER WERE PULLED, THEY GOT STRETCHED. THE SUBJECT COIL SUDDENLY BROKE OUT AND THE LOOP OF THE SUBJECT COIL MIGRATED TO THE PARENT ARTERY. THE OPERATOR USED STENT TO ATTACH THE SUBJECT COIL LOOP TO THE VESSEL WALL. THE OPERATOR TRIED TO SELECT THE CATHETER TO ANEURYSM TO PUT THE SUBJECT COIL AGAIN, BUT SELECTION WAS IMPOSSIBLE SINCE THE STENT WAS BIFOLD. THEREFORE, THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED WITH JUST ATTACHING THE SUBJECT COIL ON THE VESSEL WALL. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 15 MIN DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21580424 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21367554 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE WHILE BEING ADVANCING WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20887783 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT COIL DELIVERY WIRE HAD BROKEN DURING USE. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20292862 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE SUBJECT COIL WAS DETACHED AND THE DELIVERY WIRE WAS REMOVED, THE OPERATOR NOTICED THAT THE SMALL PART OF THE SUBJECT COIL REMAINED IN THE DETACHMENT JUNCTION AREA. THE OPERATOR REMOVED THE SMALL PART OF THE SUBJECT COIL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19294400 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS PARTIALLY DEPLOYED, IT WAS STRETCHED WHEN TRYING TO RESHEATH IT BACK TO MICROCATHETER FROM THE ANEURYSM SAC. THE STRETCHED COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS PUSHED TOWARDS ECA AND A STENT WAS DEPLOYED ACROSS ANEURYSM NECK AS A MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO ENSURE ITS PATENCY. IT WAS STRESSFUL SITUATION AND PATIENT NEEDING TO TAKE ANTIPLATELETS FOR THE STENT AND COIL LOOP. PATIENT WAS UNDER GA (GENERAL ANESTHESIA). THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF ONE HOUR. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18565484 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page