Skip to content

Target Tetra TG5413560Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Target Tetra (19)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327578683), received between Jun 23, 2023 and Feb 10, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Migration1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Perforation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 10, 2026Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOUBLE CATHETER TECHNIQUE WAS PERFORMED. ATTEMPTED TO PLACE THE SUBJECT COIL IN THE ANEURYSM; HOWEVER, IT DID NOT ENGAGE WITH THE VESSEL. THEREFORE, THE SUBJECT COIL WAS RETRIEVED AND REINSERTED INTO THE OTHER MICROCATHETER; HOWEVER, IT GOT PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS REMOVED WITH THE ENTIRE MICROCATHETER. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24301677 ↗
  • InjuryMay 24, 2024Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE MONTHS POST EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT COIL MASS MIGRATED, AND PATIENT UNDERWENT RE-TREATMENT DUE TO THE SUBJECT COIL MIGRATION. PATIENT CONDITION FOLLOWING RE-TREATMENT WAS STABLE AND THE RE-TREATMENT WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 19392271 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ENDOVASCULAR COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE OF ACOM ANEURYSM IN A PATIENT, THE POWER SUPPLY FAILED TO DETACH THE SUBJECT COIL AND DURING THIS TIME THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE SUBJECT COIL A LITTLE TOO FAR AND IT SLIGHTLY PERFORATED THE ANEURYSM. IT WAS A TINY PERFORATION. THE PHYSICAIN ENDED UP PUTTING A FEW EXTRA COILS IN AND ALSO USED A BALLOON TO CONTROL BLEEDING AT THE TIME. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Perforation

    MAUDE report 17188387 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page