GAMMA 8166-0100SRecalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · RC Lag Screw · Class 2 · Implant
All models of GAMMA (249)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327591897), received between Jun 20, 2024 and Nov 5, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration2
- Positioning Problem2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Naturally Worn1
- Off-Label Use1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Perforation3
- Insufficient Information2
- Failure of Implant1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 5, 2025Migration; Migration
AS REPORTED: "A GAMMA4 U-LAG SCREW PERFORATED THE PELVIS. THE PATIENT REPORTED PAIN AND THIS RESULTED IN A REVISION SURGERY." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: AROUND (B)(6), THE PAIN IN THE LEFT HIP JOINT GRADUALLY WORSENED AND INCREASED DURING REHABILITATION. WHEN THE SURGEON RE-CHECKED THE X-RAY, IT REVEALED THAT THE LAG SCREW HAD PERFORATED THE PELVIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SET SCREW WAS NOT TIGHTENED WHEN INSERTING THE U-LAG, AND THE U-BLADE WAS INSERTED WITHOUT X-RAY CONFIRMATION.
Patient problems: Pain; Perforation
MAUDE report 23477346 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2025Positioning Failure; Naturally Worn; Positioning Failure; Naturally Worn
AS REPORTED: "DURING INSERTION OF THE LAG SCREW, THE LAG SCREW WAS DISPLACED ANTERIORLY INTO THE NAIL, AND THE LAG SCREW WAS REMOVED. THE PHYSICIAN THOUGHT THAT THE LAG SCREW SLEEVE MAY HAVE BEEN PUSHED UP BY THE FASCIA, SO HE ADDED A NEW SKIN INCISION AND REDID THE LAG SCREW INSERTION TECHNIQUE, STARTING FROM THE STAGE OF REINSERTING THE GUIDE PIN. THE REMOVED LAG SCREW SHOWED EVIDENCE OF ABRASION, SO WE REPLACED IT WITH A NEW ONE. THE NEW LAG SCREW WAS INSERTED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23003172 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2025Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
AS REPORTED: "THE END CAP FELL OFF WHEN OPENING THE U-LAG SCREW AND BECAME UNCLEAN. THE SCREW WAS NOT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SCREW AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INSERTING THE END CAP."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22650189 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
LAG SCREW CUTOUT. REVISION SURGERY TO BIPOLAR IS REQUIRED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Perforation
MAUDE report 21123942 ↗InjuryDec 17, 2024Migration; Migration
POSTOPERATIVELY U-LAG SCREW PENETRATION HAD OCCURRED. ON (B)(6), REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED TO BE PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Perforation
MAUDE report 20953217 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2024Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
AS REPORTED: "AFTER LAG SCREW INSERTED, COMPRESSION APPLIED, SET SCREW TIGHTENED AND SLIGHTLY LOOSEN, WHEN U-BLADE WAS INSERTED WITH A HAMMER GENTLY, THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS PUSHED AND THE FRACTURE SEPARATED."
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19741600 ↗MalfunctionJun 20, 2024Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: AFTER LAG SCREW INSERTED, COMPRESSION APPLIED, SET SCREW TIGHTENED AND SLIGHTLY LOOSEN, WHEN U-BLADE WAS INSERTED, THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS PUSHED AND THE FRACTURE SEPARATED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED WITH PULLING THE FEMORAL HEAD BACK SOMEWHAT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19579140 ↗
Other ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES devices
- NA 03.033.001Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES265 reports
- GAMMA 3125-1180SStryker GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES249 reports
- NA 03.037.026Synthes GmbH · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES225 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls2 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-045Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- TRIGEN 71674067Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES201 reports
- PRECICE® Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSC5-050Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls1 report
- PRECICE Intramedullary Limb Lengthening System LSB5-075Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Rod, Fixation, Intramedullary And Accessories4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page