Skip to content

Broadway 8 BRW084132-01Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327624106), received between Feb 24, 2025 and Mar 10, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1
  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Embolism/Embolus1
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PUT THE STENT THROUGH THE SUBJECT CATHETER, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS REMOVED, AND PHYSICIAN CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITH THE INTERMEDIATE CATHETER USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24562452 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 9, 2026Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED IN THE MEDICAL PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE CLOT COULD NOT BE PULLED, ON INSPECTION THE PROXIMAL OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS NOTED TO BE KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVED THAT AIR WAS BEING PULLED OUT THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE KINK. THUS, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24553657 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS BROKEN OFF AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22046448 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE AFTER THE FIRST PASS, THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE SUBJECT CATHETER HARD TO ACCESS THE TREATMENT SITE AND THE DEVICE KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED IT LOOKED VERY TORN AND ALMOST BROKEN OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED FIVE MINUTES AND COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21749124 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BASE CATHETER CLIMBED PAST THE HORIZONTAL PETROUS AND THE SUBJECT CATHETER AND DELIVERY ASSIST CATHETER PARTIALLY CROSSED AND INGESTED THE CLOT IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). THE CLOT WAS EXTREMELY LARGE AND THE VESSEL WAS DISSECTED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE CLOT CREATED A FEW DISTAL EMBOLI WHICH LED TO AN M2 AND TWO M4 OCCLUSIONS. THE M2 OCCLUSION WAS RESOLVED WITH A DIFFERENT CATHETER. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE. UPDATE: FURTHER REVIEW OF COMPLAINT DETAILS ON 04 MARCH 2025: BY PRODUCT ASSESSMENT CENTER MANAGEMENT (PAC), IT IS CLARIFIED THAT THE SUBJECT STENT DISTAL EMBOLI MAY BE A PART OF THE PROCEDURE AND IS NOT DEVICE RELATED. FURTHERMORE, THE EMBOLI IN THE M2 WAS RESOLVED WITH ASPIRATION, AND THE EMBOLI IN M4, IN THE PHYSICIANS OPINION, WOULD RESOLVE ON ITS OWN.

    Patient problems: Embolism/Embolus; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Obstruction/Occlusion

    MAUDE report 21445663 ↗

Other Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature devices

All Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page