Broadway 8 BRW084132-01Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · Catheter · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613327624106), received between Feb 24, 2025 and Mar 10, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Material Puncture/Hole1
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Embolism/Embolus1
- Obstruction/Occlusion1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 10, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PUT THE STENT THROUGH THE SUBJECT CATHETER, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS REMOVED, AND PHYSICIAN CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITH THE INTERMEDIATE CATHETER USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24562452 ↗MalfunctionMar 9, 2026Material Puncture/Hole
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS USED IN THE MEDICAL PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THAT THE CLOT COULD NOT BE PULLED, ON INSPECTION THE PROXIMAL OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS NOTED TO BE KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN BELIEVED THAT AIR WAS BEING PULLED OUT THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE KINK. THUS, THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24553657 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER WAS BROKEN OFF AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22046448 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE AFTER THE FIRST PASS, THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE SUBJECT CATHETER HARD TO ACCESS THE TREATMENT SITE AND THE DEVICE KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED IT LOOKED VERY TORN AND ALMOST BROKEN OFF. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED FIVE MINUTES AND COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21749124 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BASE CATHETER CLIMBED PAST THE HORIZONTAL PETROUS AND THE SUBJECT CATHETER AND DELIVERY ASSIST CATHETER PARTIALLY CROSSED AND INGESTED THE CLOT IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA). THE CLOT WAS EXTREMELY LARGE AND THE VESSEL WAS DISSECTED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE CLOT CREATED A FEW DISTAL EMBOLI WHICH LED TO AN M2 AND TWO M4 OCCLUSIONS. THE M2 OCCLUSION WAS RESOLVED WITH A DIFFERENT CATHETER. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE. UPDATE: FURTHER REVIEW OF COMPLAINT DETAILS ON 04 MARCH 2025: BY PRODUCT ASSESSMENT CENTER MANAGEMENT (PAC), IT IS CLARIFIED THAT THE SUBJECT STENT DISTAL EMBOLI MAY BE A PART OF THE PROCEDURE AND IS NOT DEVICE RELATED. FURTHERMORE, THE EMBOLI IN THE M2 WAS RESOLVED WITH ASPIRATION, AND THE EMBOLI IN M4, IN THE PHYSICIANS OPINION, WOULD RESOLVE ON ITS OWN.
Patient problems: Embolism/Embolus; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Obstruction/Occlusion
MAUDE report 21445663 ↗
Other Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature devices
- EMBOGUARD BG8795UNeuravi Limited · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature2 deaths153 reports
- CEREBASE GS9090SDCerenovus, Inc. · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 recall2 deaths97 reports
- CEREBASE GS9095SDCerenovus, Inc. · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 recall1 death33 reports
- CEREBASE GS9080SDCerenovus, Inc. · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 recall13 reports
- Balloon Guide Catheter BOB-895-USMicrovention, Inc. · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 recall11 reports
- 070 Access System Gen 1Route 92 Medical · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 recall0 reports
- EMBOGUARD BG8785UNeuravi Limited · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature1 death13 reports
- CEREGLIDE SBC92122UGCerenovus, Inc. · Catheter, Percutaneous, Neurovasculature9 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page