Skip to content

LDL-Cholesterol Gen.3 08057966190Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613336121375), received between Oct 24, 2023 and Sep 28, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Non Reproducible Results” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Non Reproducible Results3
  • Low Test Results2
  • Chemical Problem1
  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Non Reproducible Results

    There was an allegation of questionable LDL-Cholesterol Gen.3 results from the cobas c 503 analytical unit. One example was provided of an initial result of 11.3 mg/dL, and a repeat result of 122 mg/dL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50914631 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2025Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED A QUESTIONABLE LDL-CHOLESTEROL GEN.3 RESULT FROM ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED ON THE COBAS C 503 ANALYTICAL UNIT. ON (B)(6) 2025: THE INITIAL RESULT FROM THE MODULE WAS 1.39 MMOL/L. THE REPEAT RESULT AT 1:2 DILUTION WAS 0.956 MMOL/L WITH A FINAL CALCULATED DILUTION RESULT OF 1.912 MMOL/L. THE REPEAT RESULT AT 1:10 DILUTION WAS 0.173 MMOL/L WITH A FINAL CALCULATED DILUTION RESULT OF 1.73 MMOL/L. ON (B)(6) 2025: THE REPEAT RESULT FROM THE MODULE WAS 1.96 MMOL/L. ON (B)(6) 2025: THE REPEAT RESULT FROM AN ARCHITECT ANALYZER WAS 4.44 MMOL/L.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23655738 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Non Reproducible Results; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH LDL-CHOLESTEROL GEN. 3 ON A COBAS C 503 ANALYTICAL UNIT. THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN AN LDL VALUE OF 5.00 MMOL/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE WAS AUTOMATICALLY REPEATED, RESULTING IN AN LDL VALUE OF 5.10 MMOL/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THESE VALUES WERE HELD AND NOT RELEASED TO THE PATIENT. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED AGAIN, RESULTING IN AN LDL VALUE OF 1.49 MMOL/L WHICH WAS THEN RELEASED TO THE PATIENT. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED AFTERWARDS AND RESULTED IN A VALUE OF 5.07 MMOL/L WITH A DATA FLAG. AN AMENDED REPORT WAS ISSUED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23416805 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Chemical Problem; Non Reproducible Results; Chemical Problem; Non Reproducible Results

    THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF QUESTIONABLE LDLC3- (LOW DENSITY, LIPOPROTEIN) RESULTS FROM THE COBAS C 503 ANALYTICAL UNIT. PATIENT 1: THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 26 MG/DL. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON ANOTHER PRO ANALYZER WITH A RESULT OF 27 MG/DL AND ON A C311 ANALYZER WITH A RESULT OF 22 MG/DL. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON AN ABBOTT ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS 87 MG/DL. PATIENT 2: ((B)(6) 2024): THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 10 MG/DL. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON ANOTHER PRO ANALYZER WITH A RESULT OF 11 MG/DL. THE SAME SAMPLE WAS REPEATED ON AN ABBOTT ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS 119 MG/DL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20783786 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2023Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Low Test Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER COMPLAINED OF DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR 1 PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED FOR LDLC3 ON A COBAS C 503 ANALYTICAL UNIT. THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 19.4 MG/DL. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED DUE TO A REQUEST FROM THE CLINICIAN. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 127 MG/DL. THE REPEAT RESULT WAS BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17998131 ↗

Other LDL & VLDL PRECIPITATION, HDL devices

All LDL & VLDL PRECIPITATION, HDL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page