Skip to content

BenchMark ULTRA PLUS Instrument 09576797001Recalls & reported problems

Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613336184608), received between Apr 24, 2025 and Sep 9, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Computer Software Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Computer Software Problem1
  • False Positive Result1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2026Computer Software Problem

    There was an allegation of a reagent position issue during a run with the BenchMark Ultra Plus Instrument.The customer started a run at 6:48 a.m. with two slides, but all necessary reagents were on board for additional slides. They added 11 more slides around 7:23. The customer scheduled a Reagent Access Point (RAP) for 11:12. The customer always uses the software to tell them what position a reagent is in for removal. When they went to remove the reagent, it was not in the position that the software indicated. The majority of the slides started at 7:23 had completed staining, and upon reviewing the slides, they found that none had stained appropriately. The customer had 7 trays loaded and all reagents were shifted one position.After the RAP was completed, the customer returned to the software and found that the reagents were now in the correct position on the software. There were 2 slides put onto the instrument at 8:55 and 9:56 and the staining for these two slides was okay.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50688195 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2025False Positive Result; False Positive Result

    THE INITIAL REPORTER QUESTIONED POSITIVE STAINING FOR 2 PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED FOR CONFIRM ANTI-PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR (PR) (1E2) RABBIT MONOCLONAL PRIMARY ANTIBODY ON A BENCHMARK ULTRA PLUS INSTRUMENT. FOR BOTH PATIENTS, THE POSITIVE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY. TESTING WAS REPEATED AS THE PATHOLOGISTS NOTED UNEXPECTED STAINING ON SLIDES PROCESSED BETWEEN THE AFTERNOON ON (B)(6) 2025 AND THE MORNING ON (B)(6) 2025. UPON REPEAT STAINING, THE RESULTS FOR BOTH PATIENTS WERE NEGATIVE. AMENDED REPORTS WERE SENT OUT. CONTROLS WERE USED AND SHOWED ACCEPTABLE STAINING.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21899904 ↗

Other Slide stainer, automated devices

All Slide stainer, automated devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page