Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial 02.18.IF3.08.RMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial insert fix S3 RM - 8mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial (46)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030895982), received between Jun 25, 2019 and Jan 17, 2023 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 17, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND IT WAS OBSERVED THAT PATIENT'S FEMORAL COMPONENT WOULD IMPINGE UPON CEMENT IN FLEXION. AT ABOUT 8 MONTHS POST PRIMARY THE SURGEON REMOVED THE POLY, CLEARED OUT CEMENT POSTERIORLY AND PUT IN A NEW POLY SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 16181553 ↗
  • InjuryDec 28, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    REVISION SURGERY AT ABOUT 1 MONTH POST PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT A SLIGHT VARUS OF THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE COULD BE THE CAUSE OF THE PAIN. THERE WAS NO LOOSENING/MOBILIZATION.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 16061013 ↗
  • InjuryApr 20, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO PAIN AFTER ABOUT 1 YEAR FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY. ONLY THE LINER WAS REPLACED, THICKNESS HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED, DUE TO YELLOW BONE AND SOFT TISSUES DISCOLORATION. SUSPECT OF INFECTION BUT NOT CONFIRMED. THE LINER WAS A LITTLE BIT DENTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 14158287 ↗
  • InjuryJul 8, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12133638 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND POLY SWAP 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10996068 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    ABOUT 2 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT FOR A INFECTION. THE SURGEON PERFORMED AN I&D AND LINER SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8731007 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page