Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial 02.18.IF5.08.LMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial insert fix S5 LM - 8mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial (46)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030896217), received between Mar 3, 2020 and Mar 29, 2023 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 29, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    AT ABOUT 20 DAYS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND POLY SWAP AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 16635898 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE POLY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14367130 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2021Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND THE SURGEON OBSERVED THAT THE PATIENT WAS IN EXCESSIVE VALGUS AND WANTED TO INCREASE THE INSET THICKNESS TO PUSH THE KNEE INTO A MORE NEUTRAL POSITION. THE SURGEON REVISED THE 8MM TIBIAL INSERT WITH A 10MM ONE 2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NOTE THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT PAIN OR INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 11752753 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY (COMPLAINT (B)(4)). ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9785501 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT 1 MONTH AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9780238 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page