Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial 02.18.TF2.RMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Tray Fix Cemented S2 RM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial (46)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030896729), received between Feb 26, 2019 and Oct 25, 2023 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Fracture1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 25, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AT ABOUT 2 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY DUE TO CEMENTED TIBIAL TRAY SUBSIDENCE. MOTO COMPONENTS HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY REVISED. THE PATIENT HAS POOR BONE QUALITY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18002681 ↗
  • InjuryJan 25, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PRIMARY KNEE SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON THE (B)(6) 2022. AT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, A TIBIA BONE FRACTURE WAS DETECTED. THE CAUSE OF THE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN. PRESENTLY ON THE (B)(6) 2022, A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AND THE FRACTURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY FIXED WITH LCP PLATE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 16240560 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2021Output Problem

    3 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY A REVISION WAS PERFORMED DUE TO THE SINKING OF THE MEDIAL TIBIAL PLATEAU. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT SHE HAD NOT FALLEN. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12438439 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2020Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    SUBSIDENCE OF THE TIBIAL TRAY, DUE TO POST-OP FRACTURE (THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE BONE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN) OF THE MEDIAL TIBIAL HEAD. 4 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY THE SURGEON REVISED ALL IMPLANTS TO GMK SPHERE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 10161544 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED DUE TO A LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL TRAY CAUSED BY A BONE FRACTURE CLOSE TO THE ANTERIOR FIXATION PEG. AFTER A FEW WEEKS FROM THE UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY, PERFORMED WITH A MOTO IMPLANT ON (B)(6) 2018, DESPITE POST-OP X-RAYS WERE GOOD, THE PATIENT CAME BACK TO THE SURGEON COMPLAINING ABOUT MILD MEDIAL KNEE PAIN. AFTER A FURTHER CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, THE SURGEON OBSERVED A BONE FRACTURE OF THE TIBIAL PLATE CLOSE TO THE ANTERIOR FIXATION PEG. AFTER MONITORING PERIOD OF THE CASE, ON (B)(6) 2019, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REOPERATE THE PATIENT, ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 8370496 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page