Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial 02.18.TF5.LMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · Tibial Tray Fix Cemented S5 LM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MOTO Partial Knee System - Medial (46)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630030896774), received between Dec 9, 2019 and May 24, 2022 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Fracture1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 24, 2022Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    AT ABOUT 1 MONTH AND HALF AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A FRACTURED TIBIA AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON CONVERTED THE PATIENT FROM A MOTO TO SPHERE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 14485682 ↗
  • InjuryJun 10, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT 6 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 11973855 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN AFTER 1 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT. THE CAUSE OF THE LOOSE TIBIAL COMPONENT IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE TIBIAL TRAY AND INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 11331834 ↗
  • InjuryDec 9, 2019Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    ABOUT 8 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY REVISION SURGERY FOR TIBIAL IMPLANT SUBSIDENCE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ALL HARDWARE REVISED AND GMK-SPHERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9436672 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page