Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis 04.01.0024Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Humeral Anatomical Metaphysis – Cementless, Size 7, 135° · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis (29)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040712620), received between Jul 29, 2022 and Apr 23, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K170910); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
Patient problems
- Medical device site infection2
- Pain2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 23, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE ANATOMICAL SHOULDER TO A REVERSE SHOULDER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 24964780 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
AT ABOUT 1 YEAR AND 6 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE IMPLANTS AND PLACED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 24343897 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR A POST-OP APPOINTMENT AND POOR RANGE OF MOTION WAS OBSERVED. THE SURGEON AT ABOUT 3 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST PRIMARY DECIDED TO REMOVE ALL COMPONENTS EXCEPT THE STEM. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 16032690 ↗InjuryJul 29, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY SURGERY OF MEDACTA PRODUCTS ON (B)(6) 2022. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE HUMERAL COMPONENT AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REVISED THE DIAPHYSIS, METAPHYSIS, AND LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE LINER FROM THE COMPETITOR GLENOSPHERE AND STEM LOOSENING. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE REVERSE LINER, METAPHYSIS AND STEM AND IMPLANTED AN ANATOMIC METAPHYSIS, DOUBLE ECCENTER AND HUMERAL HEAD. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENT HAD A PREVIOUS REVISION SURGERY OF COMPETITOR'S PRODUCTS: REVERSE 6+ YEARS POST PRIMARY THAT WAS MISSING A LARGE PORTION OF THE PROXIMAL HUMERUS. PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT CAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO SUSTAINING A WOUND BREAKDOWN FROM THE PREVIOUS REVISION SURGERY. THE SURGEON REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15127596 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K170910. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0775-2020 · Nov 4, 2019 · TerminatedMedacta Shoulder SYSTEM HUMERAL ANATOMICAL METAPHYSIS, REF 04.01.0023 through 04.01.0055, all sizes - Product Usage: The Medacta Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis is indicated for treat
Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page