Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis 04.01.0132Recalls & reported problems
Medacta International SA · Highcross PE Pegged Glenoid, Size Ø 48 mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis (29)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630040713276), received between Oct 5, 2018 and Mar 3, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K170910); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Material Deformation1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection2
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
- Osteolysis1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 3, 2026Material Deformation
LEFT SHOULDER REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND RESTRICTION OF MOVEMENT ABOUT 6.5 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. OSTEOLYSIS WAS ALSO NOTED. REVERSE SYSTEM IMPLANTED; ROTATOR CUFF WAS DEGENERATIVE BUT REPAIRABLE WHEN COMPLETING THE REVERSE. THE PE PEGGED GLENOID WAS FOUND VERY DAMAGED IN THE POSTERIOR INFERIOR SURFACE (DESPITE BEING FOUND WELL FIXED AND NO IMPINGEMENT WAS OBSERVED).
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 24494913 ↗InjuryMar 31, 2022Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
AT ABUT 2 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT SHOULDER FOR GLENOID IMPLANT LOOSENING. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, ALL DEVICES SWAPPED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13964412 ↗InjurySep 21, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
8 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT, REMOVED ALL COMPONENTS AND IMPLANTED AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12506482 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE SURGEON REVISED THE PATIENT'S SHOULDER IMPLANTS FOR A DISLOCATION (HEAD FROM LINER) ON (B)(6) 2021. THE PRIMARY SURGERY DATE IS NOT AVAILABLE. THE SHOULDER HAS BEEN DISLOCATED FOR 4 MONTHS.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 11494442 ↗InjuryAug 9, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED AFTER 11 MONTHS FROM THE PRIMARY DUE TO PAIN (THE CAUSE OF THE PAIN IS UNKNOWN, THERE WAS NO TRAUMA). THE SURGEON REVISED THE HUMERAL HEAD, DOUBLE ECCENTER, HUMERAL METAPHYSIS, AND HC PEGGED GLENOID SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8877722 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
ON SEP 7, 2018 WE WERE INFORMED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2018 DUE TO INFECTION DETECTED 2 WEEKS AFTER A PREVIOUS REVISION DUE TO SHOULDER LUXATION. THE REVISION WAS PERFORMED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATHOGEN RESULTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7938077 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K170910. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0775-2020 · Nov 4, 2019 · TerminatedMedacta Shoulder SYSTEM HUMERAL ANATOMICAL METAPHYSIS, REF 04.01.0023 through 04.01.0055, all sizes - Product Usage: The Medacta Anatomic Shoulder Prosthesis is indicated for treat
Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page