Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System 02.18.702RMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · TiNbN coated Anatomical Femur Cemented S2 RM - MEDIAL · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07630345705228), received between Nov 10, 2025 and Nov 10, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Implant subsidence” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Implant subsidence1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Malposition of Device1

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 10, 2025Malposition of Device; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Implant subsidence; Malposition of Device; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Implant subsidence

    AT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY, THE PATIENTCAME IN REPORTING PAIN DUE TO A LOOSE AND SUBSIDED BASEPLATE AND THE CAUSE IS UNKNOWN. THE PATIENT DIDN & RSQUO; T COMPLAIN ANY FALLS BUT MENTIONED POSSIBLY OVERDOING ACTIVITY, FEELING WELL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN YEARS. THE SURGEON FOUND THE BASEPLATE/POLYETHYLENE GROSSLY LOOSE AND SUSPECTED A CEMENT ISSUE, AS THE INITIAL FIT HAD BEEN EXCELLENT. THE SURGEON REVISED ALL COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ADDITIONAL NOTE FOR CLINICAL INTERNAL ANALYSES: THE X-RAY SHOWS THAT THE FEMORAL COMPONENT APPEARS TO BE POSITIONED IN FLEXION, WITH AN IMPERFECT FIT TO THE FEMORAL BONE; THEREFORETHE LEVEL 2 CHANGE THE CLASSIFICATION FROM ASSOCIATED COMPONENT TO MALPOSITIONING.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 23510665 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.