Skip to content

MOTO Partial Knee System 02.18.EIF6.08.LMRecalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · E-CROSS tibial insert fix S6 LM - 8mm · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07630345712103), received between Jul 25, 2023 and May 22, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 22, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION AFTER ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM PRIMARY. THE PATIENT HAD PRIMARY LEFT KNEE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2026. ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE MOTO S6 LM - H8 INSERT TO A SAME SIZE INSERT (MDR 2026-00482). PRESENTLY, ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO CONTINUED SIGNS OF INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE MOTO FEMORAL COMPONENT AND MOTO TIBIAL TRAY FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY AND REMOVED THE MOTO INSERT FROM THE FIRST REVISION AND IMPLANTED ANTIBIOTIC SPACERS TO TREAT THE INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25253485 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY AFTER 22 DAYS FROM THE PRIMARY SURGERY DUE TO SIGNS OF INFECTION, AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE INSERT TO THE SAME SIZE INSERT. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25230410 ↗
  • InjuryApr 14, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT HAD A KNEE INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. AT ABOUT 1 MONTH FROM PRIAMRY THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED INSERT IMPLANTING ONE OF THE SAME SIZE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24871684 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2023Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE PATIENT CAME IN DUE TO SIGNS OF AN INFECTION AND THE PATHOGEN IS UNKNOWN. ABOUT 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON PERFORMED A WASHOUT AND REVISED THE LINER. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 17387500 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Non-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.