Skip to content

MySpine Unilateral Guide 7.1027Recalls & reported problems

Medacta International SA · MySpine Unilateral left guide S01 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07630345786586), received between Aug 22, 2024 and Aug 22, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fitting Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fitting Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Fitting Problem; Fitting Problem

    THE TRAJECTORY OBTAINED USING MYSPINE UNILATERAL GUIDES AT S01 AND L5 WAS INCORRECT. HE BEGAN AT S1 AND ACCORDING TO HIM HE DID A THOROUGH SOFT TISSUE DISSECTION AND WAS SATISFIED THAT THE IN SITU FIT WAS JUST AS SOLID AS THE FIT ON THE VERTEBRAL MODEL. HE INTRODUCED THE DRILL AND TOOK A FLUORO SHOT, INDICATING THE TRAJECTORY WAS INCORRECT. HE SPENT ALMOST 30-40 MINUTES TRYING TO GET THE GUIDE POSITIONED CORRECTLY BUT WAS CONVINCED THAT THE GUIDE WAS PROBABLY PRINTED INCORRECTLY. HE THEN MOVED ONTO THE LEFT L5 GUIDE. AFTER A THOROUGH SOFT TISSUE DISSECTION AND AN INDICATED OSTEOTOMY, HE DOCKED THE GUIDE AND AFTER INTRODUCING THE DRILL AND TAKING A FLOURO SHOT WE SAW THAT THE TRAJECTORY WAS INCORRECT. HE CONTINUED TO DO MORE DISSECTION AND TOOK A SECOND SHOT AFTER DOCKING THE GUIDE BUT THE TRAJECTORY WAS STILL OFF. HE DECIDED AT THAT POINT TO FREEHAND THE SCREWS. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO PLACE THE SCREWS FREEHAND. THE ISSUE CAUSED 30-40 MINUTES DELAY; TOTAL SURGERY TIME 281 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20031372 ↗

Other Pedicle Screw Placement Guide devices

All Pedicle Screw Placement Guide devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page