icotec Pedicle System, Nut Screw, Ti 16-57-41000Recalls & reported problems
icotec AG · icotec Pedicle System, Nut Screw, Ti · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07640140431994), received between Sep 29, 2023 and May 31, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component3
- Mechanical Problem2
- Defective Device1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 31, 2026Mechanical Problem
MFR REPORT #: 3006493760-2026-00003 A PATIENT NOTICED INCREASING PAIN WHICH LED TO A FOLLOW-UP IMAGING (DATE NOT REPORTED) WHERE IT WAS NOTICED THAT NUT SCREWS LOOSENED. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ((B)(6) 2026). DURING THE REVISION IT WAS DETECTED THAT TWO PEDICLE SCREWS WERE BROKEN. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE THE PEDICLE SYSTEM. EARLIER ((B)(6) 2023), THE PATIENT HAD IMPLANTED AN ICOTEC PEDICLE SYSTEM WITH A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2024 (MDR NO. (B)(4) WHERE THE SURGEON DECIDED TO IMPLANT A 5.5 MM DIAMETER PEDICLE ROD FROM A THIRD PARTY MANUFACTURER (OFF-LABEL). DURING THIS REVISION THE ROD WAS SECURED IN THE PEDICLE SCREWS USING NEW ICOTEC NUT SCREWS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 25345301 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2026Mechanical Problem
MFR REPORT #: 3006493760-2026-00001. A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN ICOTEC PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM ((B)(6) 2025). POST-SURGERY THREE NUT SCREWS (SET SCREWS) LOOSENED (EXACT DATE WERE NOT REPORTED). X-RAY IMAGING SHOWS THAT THE PEDICLE SYSTEM WAS USED TOGETHER WITH TWO ILIAC SCREWS (FROM AN UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER). A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AND IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED ((B)(6) 2026).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 25344876 ↗InjuryApr 10, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PATIENT NOTICED INCREASING PAIN WHICH LED TO A FOLLOW-UP IMAGING (DATE NOT REPORTED) WHERE IT WAS NOTICED THAT NUT SCREWS LOOSENED. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED (B)(6) 2026). DURING THE REVISION IT WAS DETECTED THAT TWO PEDICLE SCREWS WERE BROKEN. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE THE PEDICLE SYSTEM. EARLIER (B)(6) 2023), THE PATIENT HAD IMPLANTED AN ICOTEC PEDICLE SYSTEM WITH A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2024 (MDR NO. ON . WHERE THE SURGEON DECIDED TO IMPLANT A 5.5 MM DIAMETER PEDICLE ROD FROM A THIRD-PARTY MANUFACTURER (OFF-LABEL). DURING THIS REVISION THE ROD WAS SECURED IN THE PEDICLE SCREWS USING NEW ICOTEC NUT SCREWS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24843209 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN ICOTEC PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM ((B)(6) 2025). POST-SURGERY THREE NUT SCREWS (SET SCREWS) LOOSENED (EXACT DATE WERE NOT REPORTED). X-RAY IMAGING SHOWS THAT THE PEDICLE SYSTEM WAS USED TOGETHER WITH TWO ILIAC SCREWS (FROM AN UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER). A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AND IMPLANTS WERE REPLACED ((B)(6) 2026).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24532096 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device
A PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH THE ICOTEC PEDICLE SYSTEM IN A SURGERY. DURING A POST-OP CHECK 7-10 DAYS AFTER, IT WAS DETECTED THAT SIX OUT OF EIGHT NUT SCREWS HAD LOOSENED. A REVISION SURGERY HAD TO BE CARRIED OUT. THE LOOSENED NUT SCREWS AND THE PEDICLE SCREWS WERE REMOVED AND REVISED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18266154 ↗InjurySep 29, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH THE ICOTEC PEDICLE SYSTEM IN A SURGERY ((B)(6) 2022). DURING A POST-OP CHECK, IT WAS DETECTED THAT FOUR NUT SCREWS HAD LOOSENED. A REVISION SURGERY HAD TO BE CARRIED OUT ((B)(6) 2023). DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS REALIZED THAT ONE PEDICLE SCREW HAD BROKEN. THE BROKEN PEDICLE SCREW WAS NOT REMOVED. THE LOOSENED NUT SCREWS WERE REVISED AND THE BROKEN SCREW REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL LEVEL WAS TREATED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17842817 ↗
Other Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System devices
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000Medos International Sàrl · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease387 reports
- Sequoia® 3301-1Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease184 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 8590855Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease179 reports
- Vitality® 07.02011.001Biomet Spine LLC · Orthosis, spinal pedicle fixation, for degenerative disc disease3 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system124 reports
- LineSider LS-N6SA7550Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls1 report
- LineSider LS-N6SA6545Integrity Implants Inc. · Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System2 recalls0 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721000SMedos International Sàrl · Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system97 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page