Skip to content

Neo Medical Pedicle screw kit RD-00-90-PBRecalls & reported problems

Neo Medical SA · Rod kit pre-bent 90 mm (2x) · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07640177820235), received between Jun 20, 2025 and Jun 20, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration or Expulsion of Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Arrhythmia1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 20, 2025Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    EVENT DESCRIPTION: THE SURGEON (CHU DIJON) REPORTED: "THE CASE WAS SIMPLE, HE DID IT WITH A SURGICAL RESIDENT, THERE WAS NO ALERT OR SPECIAL EVENT, EVERY-THING WENT FINE. THE REDUCTION STEPS WERE RESPECTED: -TIGHTENING WITH THE TORQUE LIMITER ALL SET-SCREWS UNTIL EVERYTHING IS AT THE LOWEST POSITION - THEN THE LAST MM IS TIGHTENED WITHOUT THE TORQUE LIMITER - CONTROL X-RAY IS MADE BEFORE BREAKING AND FOR CONTROLLING THE REDUCTION - FINAL TIGHTENING WITH STANDARD BREAKAGE OF THE 10N. M TORQUE LIMITER OF THE SET SCREW - NO CONTROL OF THE STABILITY OF ANY SET-SCREW WAS DONE AT THE END." THE IMMEDIATE POST-OP XRAY HAS BEEN PROVIDED (ROD IS IN THE CONSTRUCT, CHU DIJON), AND AN X-RAY AFTER THE PROBLEM OCCURRED HAS BEEN PROVIDED (ROD DETACHED AND MOVED TO BUTTOCK). FURTHER THE SURGEON REPORTED: "THE ROD MOVED DOWN TO THE BUTTOCK. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A NEW SURGERY FOR REMOVAL IN ANOTHER HOSPITAL." (THE HOSPITAL WHERE THE REMOVAL WAS DONE WAS IN PRIVATE HOSPITAL (B)(6). COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION: THE SALES AGENT (LIONEL SIMON) HAVE UNDERSTOOD FROM INTERVIEWING THE SURGEONS THAT "IT SEEMS THAT THE PATIENT TOOK TIME TO VISIT SEVERAL SURGEONS IN LYON, AT LEAST 2, BEFORE CHOOSING, AND IT TOOK A

    Patient problems: Arrhythmia

    MAUDE report 22300837 ↗

Other Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System devices

All Thoracolumbosacral Pedicle Screw System devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page