Skip to content

Dexter Monopolar Scissors Dexter L6Recalls & reported problems

Distalmotion SA · Dexter L6 Monopolar Scissors · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 07640184840608), received between Oct 23, 2025 and Oct 23, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • No Apparent Adverse Event1
  • Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 23, 2025Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; No Apparent Adverse Event; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; No Apparent Adverse Event

    DURING THE DISSECTION OF THE PERITONEUM FOR AN EPIGASTRIC VENTRAL HERNIA USING A TAPP PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER 36 MINUTES OF ROBOTIC CONSOLE TIME, MONOPOLAR ENERGY WAS DELIVERED VIA THE TIP SLEEVE OF THE MONOPOLAR SCISSORS TO TISSUE ON ALREADY CHARRED AND COAGULATED ANATOMICAL PLANES. NO CRITICAL STRUCTURES SUCH AS NERVES OR VESSELS PRESENT OR IMPACTED. VISUALIZATION OF THE INSTRUMENT BY THE ENDOSCOPE UNDER 10X MODIFICATION DID NOT OBSERVE ANY DEFECT. ALTHOUGH AN INSTRUMENT EXCHANGE WAS RECOMMENDED, THE SURGEON OPTED TO CONTINUE WITH THE EXISTING DEVICE DUE TO ITS ADEQUATE ENERGY DELIVERY AT THE TIP AND OVERALL SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE AND DID NOT WISH TO PROLONG THE PROCEDURE TO EXCHANGE THE INSTRUMENT. ENERGY APPLICATION DURING THE PROCEDURE WAS CONSISTENTLY DEEMED SAFE, AS THE SURGEON MAINTAINED CLEAR VISUAL CONTROL OVER THE LOCATION, TIMING, AND INTENSITY OF ENERGY DELIVERY TO THE INTENDED TISSUE. THE MALFUNCTION CARRIED ONLY A MINOR RISK OF INJURY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AND WITHOUT INCIDENT, NO HARM OCCURRED THAT REQUIRED MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23368557 ↗

Other Electromechanical Surgical System Wherein The Surgeon Annd The User Interface Can Be In The Sterile Field devices

All Electromechanical Surgical System Wherein The Surgeon Annd The User Interface Can Be In The Sterile Field devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.