MEMO 3D RECHORD MRCS28Recalls & reported problems
Corcym Srl · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MEMO 3D RECHORD (6)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08022057015075), received between Apr 7, 2017 and Oct 16, 2019 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Insufficient Device Problem Information4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
Patient problems
- No Information5
- Dyspnea4
- Fatigue2
- Mitral Insufficiency2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 16, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A PATIENT WAS INTENDED TO RECEIVE A MEMO3D-RECHORD #28 ON (B)(6) 2019. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANT/ED AND EXPLANTED ON THE SAME DAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 9198587 ↗InjuryOct 16, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A PATIENT WAS INTENDED TO RECEIVE A MEMO3D-RECHORD #28 ON (B)(6) 2019. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANT/ED AND EXPLANTED ON THE SAME DAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 9198529 ↗InjuryOct 1, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2019, A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR WITH A MEMO 3D-RECHORD WAS PERFORMED. THE IMPLANT OF THE RING WAS PERFORMED USING THE HORIZONTALLY MATTRESSED 2-0 TICRON CIRCUMFERENTIALLY. OTHER CONCOMITANT PROCEDURES WERE ALSO PERFORMED (CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING X 1, INTRAOPERATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE LIMA-LAD ANASTOMOSIS; INSERTION OF RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERIAL INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP). ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED ON (B)(6) 2019 TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FOR SHORTNESS OF BREATH. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS OF ACUTE ON CHRONIC CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION WITH RVR, ELEVATED SERUM CREATININE, PNEUMONIA DUE TO ORGANISM. ON (B)(6) 2019, RING DEHISCENCE WAS DETECTED THROUGH THE ECHO. THE PATIENT IS BEING MONITORED BUT THE RING HAS NOT BEEN EXPLANTED YET. THE CURRENT DIAGNOSIS IS OF DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY, ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION, AND PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. BASED ON THE PHYSICIAN'S ASSESSMENT, A POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR TO THE REPORTED DEHISCENCE COULD BE IDENTIFIED IN THE STITCHING AREA, WHICH WAS REPORTEDLY VERY THIN.
Patient problems: Dyspnea
MAUDE report 9142693 ↗InjuryOct 1, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2019, A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR WITH A MEMO 3D-RECHORD WAS PERFORMED. THE IMPLANT OF THE RING WAS PERFORMED USING THE HORIZONTALLY MATTRESSED 2-0 TICRON CIRCUMFERENTIALLY. OTHER CONCOMITANT PROCEDURES WERE ALSO PERFORMED (CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING X 1, INTRAOPERATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE LIMA-LAD ANASTOMOSIS; INSERTION OF RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERIAL INTRA-AORTIC BALLOON PUMP). ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED ON (B)(6) 2019 TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT FOR SHORTNESS OF BREATH. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS OF ACUTE ON CHRONIC CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION WITH RVR, ELEVATED SERUM CREATININE, PNEUMONIA DUE TO ORGANISM. ON (B)(6) 2019, RING DEHISCENCE WAS DETECTED THROUGH THE ECHO. THE PATIENT IS BEING MONITORED BUT THE RING HAS NOT BEEN EXPLANTED YET. THE CURRENT DIAGNOSIS IS OF DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY, ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION, AND PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION. BASED ON THE PHYSICIAN'S ASSESSMENT, A POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR TO THE REPORTED DEHISCENCE COULD BE IDENTIFIED IN THE STITCHING AREA, WHICH WAS REPORTEDLY VERY THIN.
Patient problems: Dyspnea
MAUDE report 9142686 ↗InjurySep 30, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2019, A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR WITH A MEMO 3D-RECHORD WAS PERFORMED. THE IMPLANT OF THE RING WAS PERFORMED USING THE HORIZONTALLY MATTRESSED 2-0 TICRON CIRCUMFERENTIALLY. DURING THE SAME SURGERY, THREE OTHER CONCOMITANT PROCEDURES OCCURRED: A TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A 33MM EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS, AND A BI-ATRIAL MAZE PROCEDURE, WITH ABLATION OF BOTH THE ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR MITRAL TRIGONES; A LIGATION OF THE LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE. AN INITIAL NORMAL POSTOPERATIVE COURSE WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS SEEN IN BY A CARDIOLOGIST FOR FOLLOW UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2019. LOW K LEVEL WAS NOTICED. THE PATIENT WAS CONSEQUENTLY SENT TO ED ON (B)(6) 2019 FOR FURTHER WORKUP, AND POSTERIOR RING DEHISCENCE WAS NOTICED ON THE ECHO. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS: HYPOKALEMIA, ACUTE ON CHRONIC CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, UNSPECIFIED HEART FAILURE TYPE. CURRENTLY, THE PATIENT PRESENTS SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION AND IS VERY SYMPTOMATIC WITH DYSPNEA, FATIGUE, ORTHOPNEA, AND NOCTURNAL DESATURATION. THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED FOR A MITRACLIP BUT WAS FOUND NOT TO BE A CANDIDATE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT ACCESS TO LEAFLETS. A RE-DO STERNOTOMY AND BIOPROSTHETIC MVR IS PLANNED, BUT NO RE-INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFOR
Patient problems: Dyspnea; Fatigue; Mitral Insufficiency
MAUDE report 9137684 ↗InjurySep 30, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ON (B)(6) 2019, A MITRAL VALVE REPAIR WITH A MEMO 3D-RECHORD WAS PERFORMED. THE IMPLANT OF THE RING WAS PERFORMED USING THE HORIZONTALLY MATTRESSED 2-0 TICRON CIRCUMFERENTIALLY. DURING THE SAME SURGERY, THREE OTHER CONCOMITANT PROCEDURES OCCURRED: A TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A 33MM EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS, AND A BI-ATRIAL MAZE PROCEDURE, WITH ABLATION OF BOTH THE ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR MITRAL TRIGONES; A LIGATION OF THE LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE. AN INITIAL NORMAL POSTOPERATIVE COURSE WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS SEEN IN BY A CARDIOLOGIST FOR FOLLOW UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2019. LOW K LEVEL WAS NOTICED. THE PATIENT WAS CONSEQUENTLY SENT TO ED ON (B)(6) 2019 FOR FURTHER WORKUP, AND POSTERIOR RING DEHISCENCE WAS NOTICED ON THE ECHO. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS: HYPOKALEMIA, ACUTE ON CHRONIC CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE, UNSPECIFIED HEART FAILURE TYPE. CURRENTLY, THE PATIENT PRESENTS SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION AND IS VERY SYMPTOMATIC WITH DYSPNEA, FATIGUE, ORTHOPNEA, AND NOCTURNAL DESATURATION. THE PATIENT WAS EVALUATED FOR A MITRACLIP BUT WAS FOUND NOT TO BE A CANDIDATE DUE TO INSUFFICIENT ACCESS TO LEAFLETS. A RE-DO STERNOTOMY AND BIOPROSTHETIC MVR IS PLANNED, BUT NO RE-INTERVENTION HAS BEEN PERFOR
Patient problems: Dyspnea; Fatigue; Mitral Insufficiency
MAUDE report 9137666 ↗InjuryFeb 25, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MEMO 3D RECHORD, SIZE 28, WAS IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8368693 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON (B)(6) 2018 A MEMO 3D, MRCS28 MECHANICAL MITRAL VALVE REPAIR RING WAS INVOLVED IN A PROCEDURE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND NOT USED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8224810 ↗InjuryApr 7, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH PATIENT TRACKING ON (B)(6) 2017 THAT THIS DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED AND THEN EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED REGARDING THE REASON FOR EXPLANT.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6472127 ↗
Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death71 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death67 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death65 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY59 reports
- Tri-Ad™ 900SFC228Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY4 deaths56 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL34Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY51 reports
- Contour 3D® 690R30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death50 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death47 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page