Skip to content

Memo 4D 4DM-28Recalls & reported problems

Corcym Srl · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08022057015426), received between Oct 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 31, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS INFORMED OF THE FOLLOWING EVENT THROUGH PATIENT TRACKING DEPARTMENT. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REPORTED ON THE PATIENT REGISTRATION FORM (PRF), A MEMO4D ANNULOPLASTY RING SIZE 28 WAS IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED INTRA-OPERATIVELY ON (B)(6) 2022. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. NO ALLEGATION OF DEVICE MALFUNCTION NOR SERIOUS INJURY ON THE PATIENT HAS YET BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE SITE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17035188 ↗
  • InjuryOct 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF A CASE OF MEMO 4D (4DM-28 ) RING DEHISCENCE AFTER 1 YEAR OF IMPLANT (DOI: (B)(6) 2020, AND DOE: (B)(6) 2021). THE PATIENT WAS RE-OPERATED WITH GOOD RESULTS. BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY INFORMATION RECEIVED, THE EVENT APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO A DETACHMENT OF THE SUTURES AND NOT TO A DETACHMENT OF THE FABRIC OF THE RING. THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL. THE DEVICE IS UNAVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS IT WAS ALREADY DISCARDED BY THE SITE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH AN EDWARDS PHISIO II SIZE 26.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12566061 ↗
  • InjuryOct 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF A CASE OF MEMO 4D (4DM-28 ) RING DEHISCENCE AFTER 1 YEAR OF IMPLANT (DOI: (B)(6) 2020, AND DOE: (B)(6) 2021). THE PATIENT WAS RE-OPERATED WITH GOOD RESULTS. BASED ON THE PRELIMINARY INFORMATION RECEIVED, THE EVENT APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO A DETACHMENT OF THE SUTURES AND NOT TO A DETACHMENT OF THE FABRIC OF THE RING. THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL. THE DEVICE IS UNAVAILABLE FOR RETURN AS IT WAS ALREADY DISCARDED BY THE SITE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH AN EDWARDS PHISIO II SIZE 26.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12566059 ↗

Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices

All RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page