SMR Metal Back Uncemented Glenoid (REF 1375.21.005)Recalls & reported problems
Limacorporate SPA · Metal-back (Ti6Al4V + PoroTi) Small-R · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08033390080446), received between Feb 1, 2017 and Jun 18, 2018 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Incompatible” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Component Incompatible1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
- Torn Material1
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Osteolysis1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 18, 2018Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
DURING SURGERY, AFTER PROSTHESIS REDUCTION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE METAL BACK GLENOID ALREADY IMPLANTED FAILED TO BE FIXED AS A CONSEQUENCE OF THE PATIENT'S GLENOID CAVITY OF SCAPULA FRACTURED (ROOT CAUSE OF BONE FRACTURE IS UNKNOWN, BUT PATIENT SUFFERS OF PRE-EXISTING RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS). THEN, A HUMERAL HEAD REPLACEMENT WAS IMMEDIATELY NEEDED CAUSING A PROLONGED SURGERY TIME OF 30 MINUTES. SURGEON SATISFIED WITH THE FINAL STABILITY OF THE IMPLANT. EVENT HAPPENED IN (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2018.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 7608837 ↗InjurySep 22, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AT THE 6 MONTH-FOLLOW-UP, ON (B)(6) 2016, SCAPULAR SPINE FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED. ACCORDING TO THE INFO REPORTED, SURGEON JUDGED THIS SCAPULAR SPINE FRACTURE AS NON SERIOUS. NEITHER REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED NOR PLANNED (WAIT-AND-SEE APPROACH ADOPTED BY SUSPENDING THE PREVIOUS REHABILITATION). EVENT HAPPENED ON JAPAN.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 6886068 ↗InjuryAug 7, 2017Torn Material
ON (B)(6) 2016 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY AND A SMR REVERSE PROSTHESIS WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT SUFFERED OF MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEAR ON THE RIGHT SHOULDER. ON (B)(6) 2016 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A ROUTINE MEDICAL CHECK AND THE X-RAYS SHOWED OSTEOLYSIS AROUND THE PEG OF THE METAL BACK GLENOID. THE PATIENT WAS NOT EXPERIENCING ANY PAIN. AT THAT TIME, THE SURGEON DECIDED THAT THE SITUATION WAS NOT SERIOUS AND THAT THE BONE SCREWS SEEMED NOT TO BE LOOSE, HENCE THE REVISION SURGERY WAS NOT PERFORMED. MOREOVER, THE SURGEON STATED THAT HE HAD NO IDEA ON THE POSSIBLE CAUSES OF THE OSTEOLYSIS. HOWEVER, AN INFECTION CANNOT BE EXCLUDED. EVENT HAPPENED IN JAPAN.
Patient problems: Osteolysis; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6770048 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2017Component Incompatible; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON (B)(6) 2016, SMR SYSTEM WAS PLACED TO THE PATIENT WITH CUFF TEAR ARTHROPATHY. ON (B)(6) 2016, POST-OP X-RAYS REVEALED THE DISLOCATION OF THE GLENOSPHERE AND THEN, CT SCANS SHOWED BONE FRACTURE AND BACK-SHIFT OF GLENOID BONE. THE WHOLE CONSTRUCT GLENOSPHERE + METAL BACK, WELL FIXED ONE EACH OTHER, HAD COME OUT FROM THE GLENOID BONE. ACCORDING TO THE INFO REPORTED, NO FALL NOR HEAVY EXERCISES AFTER SURGERY BUT PATIENT BONE QUALITY WAS A LITTLE FRAGILE. IT WAS NOTICED THAT, ONCE RECEIVED REHABILITATION, THE PATIENT DID FINE. REVISION SURGERY NOT YET PERFORMED. SURGEON'S REMARKS: "THE LOWER BONE SCREW MAY HAVE BEEN TOO SHORT (20MM) AND HAVE NOT WORKED WELL". THE EVENT OCCURRED IN JAPAN.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6292405 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-204Encore Medical, L.P. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall544 reports
- Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder 010000589Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED1 recall142 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130738203Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED175 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-432Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented1 recall117 reports
- Alliance® SBGL3007Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED162 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760138Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED146 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130790030Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED132 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-436Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page