Skip to content

TEMA Elbow 1504.14.090Recalls & reported problems

Limacorporate SPA · Humeral Stem H9 left · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08033390140249), received between Jul 13, 2026 and Jul 13, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Loose body in joint1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 13, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO LOOSENING OF HUMERAL COMPONENTS OF ELBOW PROSTHESIS. COMPLETE PATIENT CLINICAL HISTORY IS SUMMARIZED BELOW. PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY SURGERY IN 2006 FOR FRACTURE WHEN AN ELBOW PROSTHESIS FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER WAS IMPLANTED. FIRST REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 WITH A COMPLETE CEMENTLESS TEMA ASSEMBLY CONSISTING OF: HUMERAL STEM #H7 LEFT (PN 1504.14.070) HUMERAL BODY LARGE LEFT + SCREW (PN 1550.15.020) ULNAR STEM #U6 (PN 1575.14.030 LOT 1816847 STER (B)(4) ULNAR BODY LARGE LEFT + SCREW (PN 1552.15.020 LOT 1714267 STER (B)(4) ULNAR LINER LARGE LEFT (PN 1560.50.020 LOT 16AT1WL STER (B)(4). PATIENT BONE QUALITY WAS REPORTED TO BE POOR. AFTER FEW MONTHS, SECOND REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 FOR HUMERAL STEM LOOSENING (MFR. 3008021110-2026-00286) AND THE ABOVE-MENTIONED HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH: HUMERAL STEM #H9 LEFT (PN 1504.14.090 LOT 1816474 STER (B)(4) HUMERAL BODY LARGE LEFT (PN 1550.15.020 LOT 1714541 STER (B)(4). NO INDICATION REGARDING THE CEMENTATION ADOPTED WAS PROVIDED. ONE MONTH LATER, ON (B)(6) 2021, PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR THE THIRD TIME (HEREBY REPORTED) FOR LO

    Patient problems: Loose body in joint

    MAUDE report 25797021 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Elbow, Semi-Constrained, Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Elbow, Semi-Constrained, Cemented devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.