Skip to content

SMR System 1377.50.020Recalls & reported problems

Limacorporate SPA · SMR System - Metal Back Liner Small · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SMR System (47)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08033390272704), received between Jan 30, 2026 and May 4, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Loose body in joint1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Muscle/Tendon Damage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 4, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026 DUE TO DISASSEMBLY OF COMPONENTS AND METALLOSIS. PREVIOUS SURGERY IS UNKNOWN, AS WELL AS COMPLETE PRODUCT INFORMATION OF ORIGINAL IMPLANT. DURING REVISION, THE PRE-EXISTING LINER FOR METAL BACK GLENOID SMALL (PN 1377.50.020) WAS FOUND LOOSE FROM THE SMR METAL-BACK GLENOID SMALL (PN 1375.21.020) AND FLOATING IN THE JOINT, CAUSING METAL ON METAL FRICTION AND THEREFORE SEVERE METALLOSIS. SURGEON REMOVED ALL THE GLENOID COMPONENTS, AS WELL AS THE PRE-EXISTING SMR HUMERAL HEAD Ø50 MM (PN 1322.09.500) AND ADAPTOR TAPER (PN 1330.15.274) AND RE-IMPLANTED A NEW TAPER AND HEAD ON THE HUMERAL SIDE TO RESTORE SHOULDER FUNCTIONALITY WITH A HEMI ARTHROPLASTY. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AS INTENDED. PATIENT IS MALE, DATE OF BIRTH (B)(6)1960. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN THE UNITED STATES.

    Patient problems: Loose body in joint; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 25067102 ↗
  • InjuryJan 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A SHOULDER REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO CUFF FAILURE, COMPONENT WEAR, LOSS OF RANGE OF MOTION, AND PAIN. THE COMPLAINT SOURCE ALSO REPORTED THAT CUFF FAILURE CAUSED SUPERIOR MIGRATION OF THE HUMERAL HEAD, WITH SIGNIFICANT WEAR THROUGH THE LINER. THE LINER WAS STILL ENGAGED IN THE METAL-BACK COMPONENT. AS A RESULT, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REMOVE THE ANATOMIC COMPONENTS AND CONVERT THE IMPLANT TO A REVERSE CONFIGURATION. THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED: · SMR HUMERAL HEAD Ø50 MM (PRODUCT CODE: 1322.09.500, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN). · NEUTRAL ADAPTOR TAPER STANDARD (PRODUCT CODE: 1330.15.270, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN). · SMR FINNED HUMERAL BODY (PRODUCT CODE: 1350.15.110, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN). · LINER F. MET.BACK GLEN. SMALL (PRODUCT CODE: 1377.50.020, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN). · METAL-BACK GLENOID SMALL (PRODUCT CODE: 1375.20.020, LOT NUMBER: UNKNOWN). THE INITIAL SHOULDER IMPLANTATION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2009. THE PATIENT WAS FEMALE AND WAS 88 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME OF THE REVISION SURGERY. EVENT HAPPENED IN AUSTRALIA.

    Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage

    MAUDE report 24223086 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices

All Prosthesis, Shoulder, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer Cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page