Skip to content

CLEARUM HS IBP4373Recalls & reported problems

Bellco Srl · CLEARUM HS 20 High Flux dialyzer · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08051736004161), received between Aug 23, 2024 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Biocompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Biocompatibility1
  • Defective Component1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Protective Measures Problem1

Patient problems

  • Dizziness1
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
  • High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 18, 2025Leak/Splash; Protective Measures Problem; Leak/Splash; Protective Measures Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, FIFTEEN MINUTES TO ONE HOUR AFTER THE START OF THE HDF (HEMODIAFILTRATION) TREATMENT, BLOOD LEAKAGE WAS OBSERVED WITHIN THE REPORTED FILTER. THIS WAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH AN HRF (HEMODIAFILTRATION REINFUSION) FILTER. A BLOOD LEAKAGE (BLD) ALARM WAS TRIGGERED AFTER THIRTY MINUTES. THERE WAS NOTHING UNUSUAL OBSERVED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE. NO OTHER DEFECTS OR DAMAGES WERE FOUND ON THE PRODUCT WHERE THE LEAK WAS OBSERVED. PRIMING WAS DONE WITH NORMAL RESULTS. NO OTHER PRODUCTS WERE BEING UTILIZED WITH THE DEVICE. AS A RESULT, THE EXTRACORPOREAL KIT AND DIALYZER HAD TO BE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE FROM THE SAME PRODUCT ID (IDENTIFIER) AND LOT NUMBER ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT, WITHOUT RETURNING BLOOD TO THE PATIENT. THE TREATMENT WAS COMPLETED AFTER THE REMEDIAL ACTION. THE PATIENT WAS ADMINISTERED A DRUG DUE TO THE EVENT. A TOTAL OF 300 MILLILITERS (ML) OF BLOOD WAS LOST, BUT NO BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 21632596 ↗
  • InjurySep 5, 2024Defective Component; Defective Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DUE TO RENAL FAILURE, THE PATIENT REGULARLY MAINTAINED HEMODIALYSIS AT THE DEPARTMENT AT 9:00 A.M. ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT HEMODIALYSIS PERFUSION THERAPY. AFTER TWO HOURS OF TREATMENT, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS AN 8 CM (CENTIMETER) LONG CRACK BETWEEN THE SEALING RING AT THE ARTERY END OF THE FILTER SHELL AND THE FILTER BODY, AND SOME DIALYSATE EXTRAVASATED. THE DIALYZER WAS USED IN COMBINATION WITH DISPOSABLE HEMODIALYSIS TUBING. PRIMING WAS DONE WITH A NORMAL RESULT. THERE WERE NO OTHER DEFECTS/DAMAGES FOUND ON THE PRODUCT WHERE THE LEAK WAS OBSERVED. THE PATIENT DID NOT COMPLAIN OF DISCOMFORT. THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN A 0.9% SODIUM CHLORIDE INJECTION OF 300 ML (MILLILITERS) FOR BLOOD RETURN/RECOVERY AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. THERE WERE NO COMPONENTS REPLACED. THE FILTER WAS REPLACED. THE TREATMENT WAS CONTINUED AFTER CHANGING THE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT. AFTER SYMPTOMATIC TREATMENT, NO ABNORMALITIES OCCURRED THROUGHOUT THE DIALYSIS TREATMENT, THE DIALYSIS TREATMENT ENDED SUCCESSFULLY, AND THE PATIENT DID NOT COMPLAIN OF SPECIAL DISCOMFORT. THERE WAS AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT OF BLOOD LOSS. A BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS NOT PERFORMED. THE PATIENT W

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20151634 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2024Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON THE DAY OF THE EVENT, THE BLOOD PURIFICATION CENTER NURSE WAS TREATING THE PATIENT WITH A DIALYZER. IT WAS STATED THAT DURING DIALYSIS, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED DIZZINESS, WITH BLOOD PRESSURE (BP): 159/94 MMHG AND P: 71 TIMES/MINUTE. THERE WAS NO ALARM/ERROR CODE ACTIVATED/DISPLAYED. PRIMING WAS DONE WITH A NORMAL RESULT. THE REPORTING PHYSICIAN GAVE DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVENOUSLY AS A REMEDIAL ACTION, AND THE SYMPTOMS WERE RELIEVED. THE ISSUE WAS ALSO REPORTED TO THE SUPPLIES OFFICE. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED AND COMPLETED AFTER THE REMEDIAL ACTION WAS DONE. THERE WAS NO BLOOD LOSS, AND A BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS NOT PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Dizziness; High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension

    MAUDE report 20055557 ↗

Other Dialyzer, high permeability with or without sealed dialysate system devices

All Dialyzer, high permeability with or without sealed dialysate system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page