Impulse™ H749163911951Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Angiographic Catheter · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729213888), received between Oct 14, 2019 and Oct 14, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- Vasoconstriction1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 14, 2019Difficult to Remove; Material Integrity Problem; Positioning Problem; Difficult to Remove; Material Integrity Problem; Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE A VASOSPAM AND THE CATHETER BECAME LOOPED WITHIN THE ARTERY. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. AN IMPULSE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE TO VIEW THE TARGET LESION. THE CATHETER WAS PREPPED AS USUAL AND WAS ADVANCED TO IMAGE THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN LOST TORQUE OF THE CATHETER DURING ENGAGEMENT OF THE TARGET LESION AND IMAGED THE ARM. AN ARTERIAL SPASM OCCURRED WHICH RESULTED IN THE CATHETER LOOPING IN THE RADIAL ARTERY. THE CATHETER BECAME TWISTED AND KINKED DISTAL TO THE SHEATH. SUBSEQUENTLY, A FEMORAL PUNCTURE AND ENTRY WAS MADE TO ATTEMPT TO UNKINK AND UNLOOP THE CATHETER IN THE RADIAL ARTERY. THE CATHETER WAS SNARED TO PROVIDE TENSION AND ALLOW A WIRE TO PASS THROUGH TO UNLOOP AND UNKINK THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER WAS WITHDRAWN AND DISCARDED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NON-BSC DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. THE PATIENT IS IN A STABLE AND GOOD CONDITION.
Patient problems: Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 9186257 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page