Skip to content

PT Graphix™ H7491490301J1Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Guidewire with ICE™ Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2

All models of PT Graphix (6)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729254959), received between Mar 13, 2020 and Mar 14, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Fracture1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT GUIDEWIRE FRACTURE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND WAS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION. A 182CM J PT GRAPHIX GUIDEWIRE WAS SELECTED FOR USE. HOWEVER, WHILE CROSSING THE LESION, A PIECE OF THE GUIDEWIRE BROKE OFF IN THE VESSEL. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATE DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21606924 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2020Positioning Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A PLACEMENT OF THREE CORONARY STENT IN HIS RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY. WHILE REMOVING HIS CORONARY WIRE AFTER STENT PLACEMENT, IT WAS NOTED THE EMBOLIZATION OF THE NITINOL WIRE TIP COVERING IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY, ADJACENT TO THE STENT. FLUOROSCOPY CONFIRMED THE NITINOL COVERING OF THE TIP OF THE WIRE WAS IN THE RCA. A DECISION WAS MADE TO REWIRE WITH A DIFFERENT WIRE, STENTING THE AREA AND SECURING THE TIP TO THE VESSEL WALL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10147908 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). A 182CM J CHOICE PT GRAPHIX STANDARD GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED FOR USE. HOWEVER, DURING PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS FRACTURED. THE DETACHED TIP COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED WITH A SNARE. AN UNKNOWN DRUG-ELUTING STENT WAS USED TO AFFIX AND APPOSE THE DETACHED TIP IN PLACE IN THE RCA. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 10133993 ↗
  • InjuryMar 13, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. A 182CM J PT GRAPHIX GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED TO CROSS THE LESION. HOWEVER, DURING PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WIRE PROLAPSED ON ITSELF. THEN THE TIP OF THE WIRE BECAME DISCONNECTED AND BROKE OFF INSIDE THE ARTERY. SNARING WAS ATTEMPTED BUT FAILED TO RETRIEVE THE DETACHED TIP. ANOTHER WIRE WAS USED AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS FINE AND STABLE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 9829902 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page