Skip to content

UroMax Ultra M0062251000Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of UroMax Ultra (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729341109), received between Oct 10, 2018 and Aug 20, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel3
  • Leak/Splash3
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Material Puncture/Hole1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 20, 2026Fluid/Blood Leak

    It was reported that a Uromax Ultra Dilation Balloon Catheter was used during a Ureteroscopy (URS) procedure. During the procedure, it was found that the coil of the tail was broken. Additionally, when the balloon was being inflated, a leak was discovered that prevented it from fully expanding. The procedure was completed with another of the same device with no patient complications.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50335394 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Material Puncture/Hole; Burst Container or Vessel; Material Puncture/Hole

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE WAS USED IN THE URETER DURING A URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE INFLATED; HOWEVER IT WOULD NOT INFLATE. REPORTEDLY, THE BALLOON WAS INSPECTED AND A SMALL HOLE WAS NOTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON CATHETER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9756169 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2019Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON WAS USED IN THE KIDNEY, URETER AND BLADDER (KUB) DURING AN URETEROSCOPY (URS) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING INTRODUCTION OF THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON HAD A LEAK. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE OKAY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9081285 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2019Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO ONE OF TWO UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOONS USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT TWO UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOONS WERE USED IN THE URETER DURING A FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, THE FIRST BALLOON BURST. REPORTEDLY, A SECOND BALLOON WAS USED AND THE DEVICE WOULD NOT INFLATE DUE TO A LEAK NOTED ON THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE THIRD UROMAX ULTRA DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8316523 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO ONE OF TWO UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOONS USED IN THE SAME PATIENT AND PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT TWO UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOONS WERE USED IN THE URETER DURING A FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, THE FIRST BALLOON BURST. REPORTEDLY, A SECOND BALLOON WAS USED AND THE DEVICE WOULD NOT INFLATE DUE TO A LEAK NOTED ON THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE THIRD UROMAX ULTRA DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8316363 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2019Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA DILATATION BALLOON WAS USED IN THE LEFT URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION DURING A CYSTOSCOPY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON WAS LEAKING. ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS EVENT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO DATE. SHOULD ADDITIONAL RELEVANT DETAILS BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8289343 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 10, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A UROMAX ULTRA URETERAL DILATATION BALLOON WAS USED IN THE RIGHT URETER DURING A URETERAL STRICTURE BALLOON DILATION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON BREAKS UP DURING INFLATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER UROMAX ULTRA URETERAL DILATATION BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7951552 ↗

Other DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices

All DILATOR, CATHETER, URETERAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page