Impulse™ H74916391401Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Angiographic Catheter · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729343639), received between May 29, 2019 and Jun 11, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Advance2
- Material Deformation2
- Material Integrity Problem2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 11, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PIGTAIL SHEARED OFF AND SNARING OCCURRED. A 5F IMPULSE CATHETER-DIAGNOSTIC WAS SELECTED FOR USE. UPON INSERTING THE CATHETER, THE PIGTAIL PORTION OF THE CATHETER WAS COMPLETELY SHEARED OFF INTO TWO PIECES, A FEW INCHES FROM THE DISTAL TIP. THE FRAGMENT SHOT DOWN THE DESCENDING AORTA AND LODGED NEAR THE RENAL. SNARING WAS USED TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19511034 ↗MalfunctionMar 26, 2021Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A HOLE IN THE CATHETER. A 5F IMPULSE GUIDE CATHETER WITH A PIGTAIL CURVE WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN A CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE INSIDE THE PATIENT, THE CATHETER KINKED. THIS RESULTED IN AN EXTRA HOLE IN THE CATHETER, WHICH THE GUIDE WIRE WENT THROUGH REPEATEDLY. ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE KINK OCCURRED IN THE PIGTAIL CURVE. THE CARRIER TUBE WAS HYDRATED PRIOR TO REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE TUBE. A NUMBER OF MINUTES ELAPSED BETWEEN THE HYDRATION OF THE CARRIER TUBE AND THE REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE FROM THE TUBE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11575162 ↗MalfunctionJun 21, 2019Fracture; Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIP FRACTURE OCCURRED. AN IMPULSE CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP WAS FRACTURED AND THE DEVICE WOULD NOT ADVANCE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE TIP WAS OBSERVED TO BE KINKED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8722987 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2019Material Separation; Difficult to Advance; Material Separation; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CATHETER FRACTURE OCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE AORTA ARTERY. A 110CM IMPULSE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING ADVANCEMENT. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND IT WAS OBSERVED TO BE FRACTURED. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENTS BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENTS STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8650577 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page