Expo™ H74908641411Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Angiographic Catheter · Class 2
All models of Expo (47)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729367147), received between Mar 12, 2020 and Mar 12, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Perforation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Perforation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 12, 2020Material Perforation; Material Perforation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT GUIDEWIRE PERFORATED THE SHAFT. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT SUPERIOR PULMONARY VEIN. A 6F EXPO GUIDE CATHETER AND AN AMPLATZ SUPER STIFF GUIDEWIRE WERE SELECTED FOR USE. THE AMPLATZ SUPER STIFF WAS USED FOR THE TRANSSEPTAL SHEATH TO CROSS THE LEFT ATRIUM. DURING THE PROCEDURE WITH THE EXPO, THE TRANSSEPTAL DILATOR WAS REMOVED AND THE EXPO PIGTAIL WAS ADVANCED OVER THE WIRE MIDWAY UP. ONCE THE PIGTAIL WAS TORQUED AT THE TIP OF THE WIRE, IT WAS SEEN THAT THE WIRE HAD SHEARED INTO TWO PARTS. ONE PART OF THE WIRE WAS PROTRUDING FROM THE SIDEWALL OF THE PIGTAIL AND THE OTHER HAD TILT THROUGH THE DISTAL TIP. THE WIRE AND THE CATHETER WERE REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9825742 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H74908526031Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page