IMAGER™ II M001316060Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Angiographic Catheter · Class 2
All models of IMAGER II (47)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729737360), received between Aug 25, 2020 and Aug 25, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 25, 2020Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER BROKE. THE TOTALLY OCCLUDED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE CALCIFIED LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. ACCESS TO THE LESION WAS FROM THE RIGHT GROIN. A 4FR IMAGER II ANGIOGRAHPHIC CATHETER WAS ADVANCED OVER A V-18 GUIDEWIRE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE IMAGER EMBEDDED IN THE CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO). THE PHYSICIAN TRIED BACKING OUT THE DEVICE BUT EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY DUE TO THE CTO. THE V-18 WIRE WAS SWITCHED TO A DIFFERENT WIRE TO SEE IF THIS WOULD HELP. THIS WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL. IN ATTEMPTS TO PULL THE IMAGER OUT FROM THE CTO, THE IMAGER CATHETER BROKE APPROXIMATELY 80MM FROM THE DISTAL END. THE BROKEN SECTION WAS RETRIEVED VIA SNARE AND NO FRAGMENTS WERE LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AND THE PATIENT WAS FINE. IT WAS POSSIBLE THAT THE DEVICE WAS KINKED AND BROKE AT THIS LOCATION.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10452311 ↗
Other CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- TrapEase Permanent Vena Cava Filter with the VisEase Angiographic Vessel Dilator 466P306AUCordis Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC6 deaths186 reports
- Dragonfly™ OPTIS™ C408646Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC4 deaths150 reports
- Dragonfly OpStar™ 1014651Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall87 reports
- LANGSTON IPN913559Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls14 reports
- Trevo 90238Stryker Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls5 reports
- Expo™ H749085263011Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls3 reports
- Expo™ H74908526501Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 report
- Expo™ H749085263001Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page