Skip to content

ZIPwire™ M00146300B0Recalls & reported problems

Lake Region Medical · Class 2

All models of ZIPwire (24)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729761013), received between Oct 4, 2023 and Oct 4, 2023 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT DESCRIPTION: THE PRODUCT WAS USED IN A PROCEDURE WHERE LARGE PARTS OF THE TEFLON WERE LEFT INSIDE THE CATHETER AFTERWARDS. WHAT TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS TOOK PLACE? WHAT TROUBLESHOOTING STEPS, IF ANY, RESOLVED THE ISSUE?: NO. WHAT IS THE NEXT COURSE OF ACTION?: REPLACE THE PRODUCT FOR THE CUSTOMER PATIENT PRESENT AT TIME OF EVENT?: YES. PATIENT COMPLICATIONS: NO. PATIENT COMPLICATIONS DEVICE ACQUIRED FROM A DISTRIBUTOR?: NO. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY DISTRIBUTOR: WAS ISSUE PRESENT UPON OPENING PACKAGE?: NO. PHOTO OR VIDEO OF ISSUE: YES. WHAT IS THE ANATOMICAL LOCATION OF THE LESION BEING TREATED? NA. WHAT DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE? NA. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY DISTRIBUTOR ON (B)(6) 2023: THIS WAS AN ABSCESS DRAINAGE. AN AMPLATZ WIRE WAS INITIALLY USED, BUT THIS BENT DUE TO THE CATHETER INSERTION (12F PIGTAIL (ARGON)). THEREFORE SWITCHED TO ZIP-WIRE, WHERE THE PIGTAIL CATHETER WAS SUCCESSFULLY INSERTED, BUT WHEN THE MANDREL WAS TO BE REMOVED IT GOT STUCK IN THE CATHETER. WHEN I REACHED IN AND PULLED IT OUT, THE CORE CAME OUT, WHILE THE TEFLON COATING REMAINED INSIDE THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED WITH THE TEFLON COATING INSIDE. IT IS X-RA

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17870977 ↗

Other Wire, Guide, Catheter devices

All Wire, Guide, Catheter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page