Skip to content

Interlock™ M001361760Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Fibered IDC™ Occlusion System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Interlock (26)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729765103), received between Apr 8, 2020 and Jul 2, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Stretched” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Stretched2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Contamination1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Incomplete or Missing Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2025Stretched; Failure to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Stretched; Failure to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 06-JUN-2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT COIL UNABLE TO ADVANCE AND STRETCHED OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. A BSC MICROCATHETER AND 2/5MM X 5.8CM INTERLOCK WAS USED FOR TREATMENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN UTILIZED A BSC MICROCATHETER TO DEPLOY THE COIL; HOWEVER, THE COIL WAS UNABLE TO BE PUSHED OUT OF THE CATHETER. FOLLOWING MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN RETRACTED THE COIL, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE COIL HAD BECOME STRETCHED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED PUSHER WIRE WAS DETACHED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22388029 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2023Contamination; Incomplete or Missing Packaging; Contamination; Incomplete or Missing Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DEVICE CONTAMINATION OCCURRED. A 2/5MM X 5.8CM VORTX DIAMOND PE F-IDC WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WHEN THE PACKAGE IS UNCOVERED, THE COIL CARRIER SYSTEM WAS TAKEN OUT. HOWEVER, THE PROTECTION CABLE WAS NOT SECURING THE HOLES OF THE PROTECTION HYPOTUBE LEAVING THE COIL WITHOUT PROTECTOR AND FELL ON THE GROUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER COIL. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18011988 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2020Break; Entrapment of Device; Stretched; Break; Entrapment of Device; Stretched

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MAIN COIL WAS BROKEN. A 2/5MM X 5.8CM VORTX DIAMOND INTERLOCK COIL WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING A GASTROESOPHAGEAL VARICES EMBOLIZATION, AFTER 8X20 AND 6X10 COILS WERE DEPLOYED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE 5X5.8 COIL WAS STUCK AND WAS BROKEN. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS SLOWLY PULLED, IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE COIL WAS STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND PATIENT WAS STABLE POST PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9938143 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page