Interlock™ M001361760Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Fibered IDC™ Occlusion System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Interlock (26)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729765103), received between Apr 8, 2020 and Jul 2, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Stretched” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Stretched2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Contamination1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Failure to Advance1
- Incomplete or Missing Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 2, 2025Stretched; Failure to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Stretched; Failure to Advance; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 06-JUN-2025. IT WAS REPORTED THAT COIL UNABLE TO ADVANCE AND STRETCHED OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. A BSC MICROCATHETER AND 2/5MM X 5.8CM INTERLOCK WAS USED FOR TREATMENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN UTILIZED A BSC MICROCATHETER TO DEPLOY THE COIL; HOWEVER, THE COIL WAS UNABLE TO BE PUSHED OUT OF THE CATHETER. FOLLOWING MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, THE PHYSICIAN RETRACTED THE COIL, AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE COIL HAD BECOME STRETCHED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. HOWEVER, RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED PUSHER WIRE WAS DETACHED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22388029 ↗MalfunctionOct 26, 2023Contamination; Incomplete or Missing Packaging; Contamination; Incomplete or Missing Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A DEVICE CONTAMINATION OCCURRED. A 2/5MM X 5.8CM VORTX DIAMOND PE F-IDC WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE WHEN THE PACKAGE IS UNCOVERED, THE COIL CARRIER SYSTEM WAS TAKEN OUT. HOWEVER, THE PROTECTION CABLE WAS NOT SECURING THE HOLES OF THE PROTECTION HYPOTUBE LEAVING THE COIL WITHOUT PROTECTOR AND FELL ON THE GROUND. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER COIL. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18011988 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2020Break; Entrapment of Device; Stretched; Break; Entrapment of Device; Stretched
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MAIN COIL WAS BROKEN. A 2/5MM X 5.8CM VORTX DIAMOND INTERLOCK COIL WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING A GASTROESOPHAGEAL VARICES EMBOLIZATION, AFTER 8X20 AND 6X10 COILS WERE DEPLOYED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE 5X5.8 COIL WAS STUCK AND WAS BROKEN. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS SLOWLY PULLED, IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT THE COIL WAS STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY WITHOUT ANY INTERVENTION AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND PATIENT WAS STABLE POST PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9938143 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page