Skip to content

Interlock™-35 M001363720Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Fibered IDC™ Occlusion System · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729793069), received between Feb 28, 2020 and Apr 1, 2022 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Twisted/Bent” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Premature Activation1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 1, 2022Premature Activation; Separation Failure; Premature Activation; Separation Failure

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2022. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL FAILED TO DETACH. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A 6MM X 10CM INTERLOCK WAS SELECTED FOR USE. THE COIL WAS DEPLOYED THROUGH THE 5F SINGLE CURVED IMAGING CATHETER; HOWEVER, THE DEVICE FAILED TO DETACH AFTER PUSHING SEVERAL TIMES. THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THE COIL GOT DETACHED WITHOUT OPERATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND THE PATIENT WAS STABLE. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT THERE WERE MISSING FIBER BUNDLES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13978778 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2020Material Twisted/Bent; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Material Twisted/Bent; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    REPORTABLE BASED ON DEVICE ANALYSIS COMPLETED ON 12FEB2020. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COIL PUSHER WAS BENT. A 6MM X 10CM INTERLOCK COIL WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE COIL WAS INTRODUCED INTO AN ANGIODYNAMIC BERN CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN PUSHED THE COIL PAST THE END OF THE CATHETER AND THE COIL PUSHER MADE A 90 DEGREE BEND. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO RETRACT THE COIL PUSHER AND HAD TO PULL EVERYTHING OUT AS A UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AND PATIENT CONDITION WAS STABLE POST PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, DEVICE ANALYSIS REVEALED THAT THE MAIN COIL WAS NOT RETURNED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9771289 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page